Answer:
Shaping
Explanation:
In psychology, shaping refers to the process of reinforcing successively closer and closer approximations to a desired terminal behavior.
Shaping has different stages:
- Reinforce any response that in some way resembles the desired behavior.
- Reinforce the response that closely approximates the desired behavior
- Reinforce the response that resembles the terminal behavior even more closely.
- Continue reinforcing closer and closer approximations to the terminal behavior
- Reinforce only the terminal behavior.
As you can see shaping starts by reinforcing any response that resembles the desired terminal behavior and then it finishes by reinforcing only the terminal behavior.
In this example, <u>the therapist initially gave him a piece of chocolate any time he made a sound with his lips</u>. Then <u>he only received a piece of chocolate for saying complete words</u>. Finally, <u>he would get the chocolate for saying complete sentences. </u>
Thus, this is an example of shaping, since the reinforcements where changing as the behavior got closer and closer to the terminal desired behavior.
The main reason why people question Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is that they feel that the destruction on a large-scale was uncalled for.
<h3>What is a Bomb?</h3>
This refers to the explosive device that is used to destroy a place and can have devastating effects and is also called an ordnance.
Hence, we can see that The main reason why people question Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is that they feel that the destruction on a large scale was uncalled for.
Read more about Hiroshima bombings here:
brainly.com/question/8242127
#SPJ1
The flowers were so yellow I was nearly blinded.
Hyperbole: an exaggeration
Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.