All categories

3 years ago

What is the answer i really need help (−3)3 + (5 − 2)4

Mathematics

1 answer:

Katarina [22]3 years ago

8 0

The answer to your question is 3
Reasons : -9+ 3•4= -9+12= 3.

You might be interested in

A set of observations on a variable measured at successive points in time or over successive periods of time constitute aa. geom

il63 [147K]

You’re answer is B love!

6 0

3 years ago

Dmitry [639]

415+86+12(2+5) first start by multiplying 12 and 2 and you will get 24 then multiply 12 and 5 and you get 60 so 415+86+24+60=585

4 0

2 years ago

if 3/5 of a number exceeds it's 2/7 by 44. find the number. the correct and fastest answer will get brainliest

olya-2409 [2.1K]

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

A number :

$x$

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

3/5 of it :

$\frac{3}{5} x \\$

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

2/7 of it :

$\frac{2}{7} x \\$

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

3/5 of a number exceeds its 2/7 by 44 thus :

$\frac{3}{5} x - \frac{2}{7} x = 44 \\$

(( Find the number )) ---¢ x asked

So we need to solve the above equation for x.

$\frac{3}{5} x - \frac{2}{7} x = 44 \\$

Multiply sides by 35

$(35) \times ( \frac{3}{5} x) - (35) \times ( \frac{2}{7} x) = 35 \times 44 \\$

$(7 \times 3x) - (5 \times 2x) = 4 \times 35 \times 11 \\$

$21x - 10x = 140 \times 11$

$11x = 11 \times 140$

Divide sides by 11

$\frac{11}{11} x = \frac{11 \times 140}{11} \\$

$x = 140$

Done...

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

7 0

3 years ago

Graph the equation. y=3(x+1)^2-2 <br> HELP!!

charle [14.2K]

Answer:

look at the sceenshot how you put the graph in

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Rowena is proving that AD ≅ EB. Which statement does the ♣ represent in her proof?

zepelin [54]

Using the ASA congruence theorem, the missing statement in her proof is: A. ΔACD ≅ ΔECB.

<h3>What is the ASA Congruence Theorem?</h3>

Two triangles are congruent by the ASA congruence theorem if they have two pairs of corresponding congruent angles and a pair of included congruent sides.

In the proof given in the diagram, using the ASA congruence theorem, Rowena has been able to prove that ΔACD and ΔECB have two pairs of corresponding congruent angles and a pair of included congruent sides.

Therefore, the missing statement in her proof is: A. ΔACD ≅ ΔECB.

Learn more about the ASA congruence theorem on:

brainly.com/question/2102943

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago