Answer:
He was attempting to explain phenomena universal across cultures.
Explanation:
The collective unconscious could be seen as a concept of idealism borne out of the unconscious frame of mind which is more towards a general concept of human thoughts and instinct. It is different from personal views, thought or scope. The collective unconscious focuses on the part of the unconscious mind which is general to all humans which differentiates it from the personal unconcious which is unique to an individual being. By this we can infer that Carl Jung is trying to explain a scope of analytical psychology which is a phenomena that cuts across all cultures or human rather Than each distinct being.
Yes. There are always forces that are transforming the U.S. economy in some way. These forces can be through the government (monetary or fiscal policy) or through the free market.
Answer:
you just type in your question at the top of the page, then you will see a bunch of answer to your question
Answer: b)Change blindness
Explanation:
Change blindness is defined as situation where alteration in visual stimulus takes place but gets unnoticed by the observer. Change blindness usually occurs in situation where visual rapidly flickers, attention of observer is moved etc.This causes distraction is careful observation of person.
According to the question,if a person fails to notice shorter length of sideburns because switching of focus from one man to another caused distraction in attention .Thus, it is a case of change blindness.
Other options are incorrect because face recognition, component oriented recognition and bottom-up process is not depicted through question's scenario.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Julian Rotter.
Explanation:
Rotter uses the empirical law of effect that states that people are motivated to seek positive stimulation, or reinforcement, and to avoid unpleasant stimulation. Rotter main ideas in social learning theory is that personality represents an interaction of the individuals with their environment, it cannot be conceived individual personality internal independent of the environment. For Rotter personality and thus behavior is changeable, to the theory of rotter in any given situation, there are multiple behaviors a person can engage in. For each possible situation, there is a behavior potential so personality is a relatively set off potential responses to various situations
