What would be considered a secondary source about the assasination of Abraham Lincoln

1 answer:

3 0

A secondary source could be someone that maybe discovered the body or is doing evaluations to see why or how he died, like a doctor for instance it would be a secondary source because............the doctor was not there and he did not watch so....and if he wrote about it then that would be a secondary source! :) <3 hope this helps!

You might be interested in

How did the Seven Years War change the map of America?

Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

The Seven Years' War changed economic, political, and social relations between Britain and its colonies.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

what advantages did the Europeans have over the native americans in terms of conquest? provide at least two!! PLEASE AND THANK Y

Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

1. They were more powerful for they had a strong colonies throughout the world.

2. They had better and more weapons and many other things needed 1for the conquest.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Which great west african state emerged as a power around 1235?

devlian [24]

The west African state was Mali

5 0

3 years ago

Which civil rights leader is credited with raising the self-esteem of black americans, reconnecting them with their african heri

Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Malcolm X has been described as one of the greatest and most influential African Americans in history. He is credited with raising the self-esteem of black Americans

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Write an essay describing the quote in relation to the opinion of Rizal to the Katipunan’s Plan "To die and conquer is pleasant;

leva [86]

Answer:

To die and conquer is pleasant; but to die and be conquered is painful."

Explanation:

To die and conquer is pleasant but to die and be conquered is painful because living like a slave under invaders is very painful and shameful for the people who have self respect. Conquering a place is a very pleasant feeling but someone be conquered is a painful feeling. Those people having no self respect can live as a slave in order to save their life but those people who have self respect can't live as a slave. They prefer death instead of living as a slave so they revolt and fought for the freedom of theirselve and their country. So that's why the opinion of Rizal is correct. The kings in ancient times considered shameful to be conquered so that's why they fight till their death but can't accept the slavery of the conqueror.

3 0

3 years ago