Answer:
A Marylander by birth, Booth was an open Confederate sympathizer during the war. A supporter of slavery, Booth believed that Lincoln was determined to overthrow the Constitution and to destroy his beloved South. After Lincoln’s reelection in November 1864, Booth devised a plan to kidnap the president and spirit him to Richmond, where he could be ransomed for some of the Confederate prisoners languishing in northern jails. Booth enlisted a group of friends from Washington to aid him in his attempt. That winter, Booth and his conspirators plotted a pair of elaborate plans to kidnap the president; the first involved capturing Lincoln in his box at Ford’s Theater and lowering the president to the stage with ropes. Booth ultimately gave up acting to focus on these schemes, and spent more than $10,000 to buy supplies to outfit his band of kidnappers
Explanation:
Itdidnt fail, it succeded, even though he was caught.
Depends on what you think...
if you think rewards make people more likely to follow the norms of society then it could be because they get something out of it and it is some sort of bribery or motivation,
if you think punishments make people more likely to follow the norms of society, it could be because they don't want the punishment and it is threatening.
It was sort of like a catalyst for the industrial revolution. That, in turn, allowed Americans to make things at a more efficient rate.
Answer: Bullwhip effect
Explanation: Bullwhip effect is describes as the effect that is caused in supply chain. The changed demands of the customer results in the more stock requirement for supply chain so that the needs of the consumers can be fulfilled.
The increment in supply chain is seen from retailer field to supplier field. According to the situation mentioned in question , bullwhip effect is followed by the restaurant to promote the lobster dish by selling them in large units.Thus, the supply chain and related process face large supply of lobster and service.
Answer:
The School Board says Libby and her friends released an unauthorized publication on school grounds. Their defense should be "the whole program (including content, publication, and location) was discussed with and approved by her teacher (her primary interface with the school hierarchy)" If there is any fault to be found, it falls on a) the Teacher's head since she didn't advise Libby to seek permission from any other members in the hierarchy, and/or b) the hierarchy itself for not conveying the need to seek permission for thios type of program. I'm sure other "publications" (artwork, themes, book reports, biographies, and so on) can be shown to set precedent for publications on school grounds without formal permissions.
Re First Ammendment Rights: The description of documents in the ammendment clearly parallels the content of the newspaper. Per referenced source": Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.
Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
Explanation:
