1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marysya12 [62]
3 years ago
15

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!In 1830, how did South Carolina attempt to avoid paying a tariff they opposed?
How did the case of Worcester v. Georgia embolden states’ rights advocates?

Which political idea advocates for individual states being allowed to choose whether to allow slavery or not?

How did the U.S. Congress ensure the balance of power between slave and free states when Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave state in 1820?

How did the Missouri Compromise address the issue of the expansion of slavery into western territories?

How did California’s desire to be admitted to the union as a free state in 1850 cause disagreements between the North and South?

How did the Compromise of 1850 ease the south’s concerns that the U.S. Congress would not abolish slavery in light of California being added as a free state?

What did the Fugitive Slave Act require of northern states?

What was Georgia’s response to the Compromise of 1850 which outlined southern rights and the south’s devotion to the Union?
History
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

You have a lot of questions Multiple Answers see below:

Explanation:

Worcester V. Gerogia was a landmark case where it was deemed the Federal Government inherited from Great Britain the sole power of conquest, purchases, and political dominion, and individual states had no authority in American Indian affairs. Georgia's statute was therefore invalid.

Idea that advocates state rights to choose slavery The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that mandated “popular sovereignty”–allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state's borders

Congress maintained the balance in 1820 by admitted Missouri as a slave state and admitting Maine as a free state to maintain equality among slave to non-slave states at 12 a piece.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the latitude 36°30′ as the northern limit for slavery to be legal in the territories of the west. As part of this compromise, Maine (formerly a part of Massachusetts) was admitted as a free state. This addition maintained the balance of power in the U.S. Senate between the free states and the slaveholding states.  As most of Missouri fell below that line, it was allowed to join the union as a slaveholding state.

California was admitted into the Union as a free state From late 1848, Americans and foreigners of many different countries rushed into California for the California Gold Rush, exponentially increasing the population. In response to growing demand for a better more representative government, a Constitutional Convention was held in 1849. The delegates unanimously outlawed slavery. They had no interest in extending the Missouri Compromise Line through California and splitting the state; the lightly populated southern half never had slavery and was heavily Hispanic

The Fugitive Slave Act: One statute of the Compromise of 1850, enacted September 18, 1850, is informally known as the Fugitive Slave Law, or the Fugitive Slave Act. It bolstered the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793. The new version of the Fugitive Slave Law required federal judicial officials in all states and federal territories, including in those states and territories in which slavery was prohibited, to assist with the return of escaped slaves to their masters actively in the states and territories permitting slavery. Any federal marshal or other official who did not arrest an alleged runaway slave was liable to a fine of $1000.

Georgia's response was the Georgia Platform which was a statement executed by a Georgia Convention in Milledgeville, Georgia on December 10, 1850, in response to the Compromise of 1850. Supported by Unionists, the document affirmed the acceptance of the Compromise as a final resolution of the sectional slavery issues while declaring that no further assaults on Southern rights by the North would be acceptable

You might be interested in
How did landowner's make a profit off of sharecropping?
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Who made up the top group of plato's ideal goverment
Alik [6]
The top group was philosopher kings i believd
5 0
3 years ago
What is amending the constitution and how must it be done?
statuscvo [17]
Constitution is saying our rights not giving us our rights
5 0
3 years ago
which feature of the us constitution did the federalists indicate to show that having to much power concentrated in one branch o
kirill [66]

Explanation:

How the U.S. Constitution Separates National Power

by Xiaohong Wei The Constitution of the United States of America, written well over 200 years ago, has been the foundation for building one of the great nations. It is the central instrument of American government and the supreme law of the land. For more than 200 years, it has guided the evolution of U.S. governmental institutions and has provided the basis for political stability, individual freedom, economic growth and social progress. However, the birth of the Constitution is not accidental, but has complicated economic and political backgrounds. The period after the Revolutionary War was characterized by economic depression and political crisis on the grounds that the Articles of Confederation just devised a loose association among the states, and set up a central government with very limited powers. The central government could not get the dominant position in the country’s political life while the individual states could do things in their own ways. In this chaotic situation, the central government was incapable of paying its debt, of regulating foreign and domestic commerce, of maintaining a steady value of the currency, and worst of all, incapable of keeping a strong military force to protect the country’s interests from foreign violations. As time went by, the old system became more and more adverse to the development of the young nation, and political reform seemed to be inevitable. The best solution was to draw up a new constitution in place of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was drawn up by 55 delegates of twelve states (all but Rhode Island) to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788. That distinguished gathering at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall brought together nearly all of the nation’s most prominent men, including George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin. Many were experienced in colonial and state government and others had records of service in the army and in the courts. As Thomas Jefferson wrote John Adams when he heard who had been appointed: “It is really an assembly of demigods.” Despite the consensus among the framers on the objectives of the Constitution, the controversy over the means by which those objectives could be achieved was lively. However, most of the issues were settled by the framers’ efforts and compromises, thus the finished Constitution has been referred to as a “bundle of compromises”. It was only through give-and-take that a successful conclusion was achieved. Such efforts and compromises in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 produced the most enduring written Constitution ever created by humankinds. The men who were at Philadelphia that hot summer hammered out a document defining distinct powers for the Congress of the United States, the president, and the federal courts. This division of authority is known as a system of checks and balances, and it ensures that none of the branches of government can dominate the others. The Constitution also establishes and limits the authority of the Federal Government over the states and emphasizes that power of the states will serve as a check on the power of the national government.

<h3>I hope it will help you</h3>

<h3><em>please</em><em> make</em><em> me</em><em> brainlest</em></h3>

<h2>THANK U</h2>

5 0
3 years ago
7.Before I was a U.S. state, I was a kingdom with a queen! Ocean water forms my entire border. What state am I?
serious [3.7K]

Hawaii is the answer to your question.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the relationship between East, West, and South Africa with Europe is correct?
    5·1 answer
  • true or false:the warming of the climate at the end of the ice age did not affect the move to mesopotamia
    15·1 answer
  • How did the ottoman empire affect European history?
    15·2 answers
  • America's artistic achievements in the first half of the nineteenth century
    14·1 answer
  • Who wrote the bills that became laws
    7·1 answer
  • Italians accepted the use of violence by the fascists because
    13·1 answer
  • Today, which group of immigrants is given special preference?
    8·1 answer
  • Medieval times are also known as
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP !
    9·1 answer
  • How did their convergence affect the cultures of North America,Africa,and Europe?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!