The correct answers are validity; reliability.
Answer 1: <span>The ability of a test to measure what is purports to measure is called validity.</span> Validity is defined as the ability of a test or study to actually to measure what it claims to measure. For instance, if a test aims to measure a population sample's heart rate, but ends up measuring blood sugar levels instead, it does not have validity, since it did not measure what it claimed or set out to measure. <span>
</span>
Answer 2: Reliability refers<span> to the consistency of test results.</span> Reliability can be defines as the ability of a test or measure to consistently produce the same results at different, times, settings or locations. If the same test or measure produces different outcomes or results at different times or locations, it is low in reliability.
I think you forgot to give the options along with the question. I am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. "The price system doesn't always account for everything, like the costs of public goods" would not be <span>considered a benefit of the price system. I hope the answer has come to your help.</span>
You have just committed an attributional bias called "the fundamental attribution error."
The fundamental attribution error is the inclination individuals need to overemphasize individual qualities and disregard situational factors in judging others' conduct. As a result of the fundamental attribution error, we have a tendency to trust that others do awful things since they are terrible individuals.
Trade Sanctions. is a nonviolent means of coercion that the United States used then (and continues to use today)
