Answer:
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still, others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Explanation:
i love this question.
Answer: please try A or D try A instead
Explanation:
i had this one yesterday
Answer: Avoidant attachment.
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case Dawn with her friends with benefits perspective is further displaying an avoidant attachment. Avoidant attachment styles tends to reflect the acutely independent, autonomous , and at times embarrassed with the thoughts of intimacy. Theses individuals are known to be apprehensive to commitments.
Answer:
No. The Romans did not commit genocide against the Gauls
Explanation:
Julius Ceaser's Gallic Wars occurred from 58 to 51 B.C. Gaul was invaded by the Romans mainly for money. Ceaser needed to pay off his debts and also wanted to keep making a name for himself, thus invading Gaul was the answer. He didn't care about the people who lived there nor did he ever discuss their culture, nationality, or race as being a reason for invading. If we look at the definition of genocide it's "the deliberate or systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." Again, Ceaser never listed any of those as being a reason for invasion; all he needed was victories.
