Question

**Will Give Brainliest If Right** **150 or more words only** **50 points**Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Answer 1

Answer:

Controlled burns clear brush on the forest floor to make way for saplings to grow.  They also assist in replenishing nutrients to the soil.  Wildfires can be bad in the sense that they can kill animals if they have not relocated.

Well, why? Why are they a good thing? Let’s come up with three reasons—a) they prevent real forest fires by reducing fuel for future fires, b) germination of flowering plants is stimulated, and c) nutrient-rich soil is exposed. Now, if we add our three points to the topic, we’ll have a thesis statement that will serve as a beginning of the body paragraphs because the points will translate into the topics of the body paragraphs. Here is what the thesis statement (your argument) will, thus, look like:

Controlled fires are a good thing because they prevent real forest fires by reducing fuel for future fires, germination of flowering plants is stimulated, and nutrient-rich soil is exposed.

Explanation:

When constructing an argument for anything (either for or against), it is important to first come up with a topic then three points that support the topic by answering “why?” This is what will turn into your thesis. For instance, let’s say you are in favor of controlled fires. Your topic might resemble the following:

Please give me Brainliest for this!

Answer 2

Wild forest fires cause in depth harm to flora and fauna and end in destruction of man-made property in and around the space of the fireside.

Controlled fires are used by agriculturists and forest officers to keep wild fires trapped. It involves careful, controlled burning of bound areas of the forest, to clear it off ignitable organic matter. within the event of fire, this cleared-off space acts as a barrier for fire from spreading more.

Thick smoke from such artificial fires may be a cause for environmental concern too. There are good sides and bad sides to this. It can help with preventing wild fires and controlling them, however it can also cause harm to all the animals living in that specific area. They can lose their habitat and could even die. I believe that controlled wild fires are something that should be done especially in areas where they’re a lot more common than others. (Such as California) A big portion of the state gets burnt to the ground and many people lose their businesses, homes, and even loved ones.