Answer:
a
Explanation:
it would have prevented the only president in the options and George Bush was in the 2000 election.
An option...
You could argue that although many have found that coming to America meant greater opportunities, there are still many constraints.
By constraints I mean that due to wealth, race, or other factors you may not be able to achieve as much as someone else.
Hope this helped you!
The chauffeur killed Lord Hazelton
This case can be solved from the facts discovered by Detective Percule Hoirot. The first fact to keep in mind is that:
- Lord Hazelton was killed by a blow on the head with a brass candlestick.
From this, it can be inferred that fact C. is not true because he did not die from a fatal dose of strychnine. In addition, it can be concluded that at the time of the murder in cook was not in the kitchen.
If the cook was not in the kitchen at the time of the murder, that means Sara was not in the dining room at the time of the murder (fact E). So it can be concluded that it was Lady Hazelton who was in the dining room.
If Lady Hazelton was in the dining room at the time of the murder, the one who killed Lord Hazelton was the chauffeur (Fact D)
According to the above, the one who killed Lord Hazelton was the chauffeur.
Note: This question is incomplete because the question is missing. Here is the question.
- Who murdered Lord Hazelton?
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/4163827
Sociologist William Julius Wilson uses this term Jobless ghettos to describe high-poverty minority neighborhoods where the majority of adults do not work.
The negative urban population in the America has grown from 33 percent of all nationwide poverty in 1959 to almost 50 percent in 1991, maximum hastily in African American neighborhoods.
Social scientists like Wilson generally outline ghetto neighborhoods as those inside ghetto poverty census tracts, a proper time period for regions "wherein at least forty percent of the residents are terrible." He unearths it alarming that between 1970 and 1990, 1,203 tracts fell to ghetto poverty stage within the country's a hundred largest cities.
Wilson refutes the argument made by way of sociologists Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton that despair-generation ghetto poverty in the 1930s was simply as focused because it changed into in the Seventies due to the fact African American communities suffered identical racial segregation no matter the 12 months. but segregation does no longer provide an explanation for why, from 1970 to 1990, concentrated poverty has tripled in sure African American neighborhoods, nor does it remember "the rapid boom of joblessness, which accelerated through these two decades."
Learn more about Jobless ghettos here brainly.com/question/7730797
#SPJ4
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
