The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer: True
Everywhere is full of animals and plants of some sort
I believe the answer is: <span>Nature vs. nurture (study both to measure the effect of each)
Nature refers to the biological factors that could influence the development of sexual identity (such as the the amount of hormones in our body)
Nurture refers to the influential factors that the person have when they're interacting with their surroundings.</span>
Answer:
Race logic
Explanation:
This is an example of a process known as "race logic." This occurs when different people are treated differently, or their actions are explained differently, based on the race that they belong to. In this example, the same accomplishments and behaviour are understood differently in white and black people. This type of logic is an example of a bias that gets in the way of equality.