1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
3 years ago
7

Your boss wants you to blog primarily about your company news, its services, and various corporate events. What is your response

?
1. "That’s a good idea. We want to attract the most qualified visitors with our posts, so we should help people understand our business."
2. "That’s not a good idea. We’re trying to attract new visitors with our posts. These people haven’t yet heard of our company. If we write about ourselves, they won’t find us organically."
3. "That's a good idea. Blogging not only helps attract new visitors but convert leads as well. We can generate more qualified leads by including event calls-to-action at the end of the posts."
4. "That's not a good idea. The more focus our blog can have, the better. We need to decide between company news, service, and corporate event announcements."
Business
1 answer:
vazorg [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

2. "That’s not a good idea. We’re trying to attract new visitors with our posts. These people haven’t yet heard of our company. If we write about ourselves, they won’t find us organically."

Explanation:

As in the question, it is mentioned that the company want the people to know about the company, its services, news, etc

The company want to do the promotion by advertisements, social media so that more and more people could be connected with the company

By writing an interesting posting, the new visitors could be attracted which reflects a good sign for the company.  

If we write about ourselves so there would be no use as our primary purpose is to promote our company so that more and more person get to know about it

You might be interested in
How do trade-offs decided by corporations and government impact our lives?
Fittoniya [83]

Explanation:

Trade offs are something in which there are two things and we choose one of them according to our own preference or need. This is and should be our personal decision, but when Corporations and Governments decide on what to choose between two things, there would might be a negative impact on someone's life. He might feel controlled by the corporations and governments. For example, if corporations of CNG decides with the government that it is better for consumers to use CNG than Petrol in their cars, and lowers taxes on CNG and encourage consumers to shift towards CNG, then this trade off will have an impact of being controlled by the big giants. The choice should be of consumer's. The consumer should be the one who will trade off between things who are preferable for him.

8 0
3 years ago
The range of an area where users can access the Internet via high-frequency radio signals transmitting an Internet signal from a
defon

A) hotspot

Bluetooth is for short distance and pan is Personal area networks (PANs) connect an individual's personal devices

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Crimson Corp. has a component that is a discontinued operation. The component incurred a loss from operations of $40,000. The co
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

$60,000 income tax benefit

Explanation:

Since Crimson Corp. had a loss from operations and sold the asset for a loss we know that they lost money with the asset and an income tax benefit was generated. To calculate the income tax benefit we need to add both losses: $40,000 (operation) + $160,000 (sale) = $200,000 in total losses.

$200,000 x 30% = $60,000 income tax benefit

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following phrases is an example of structural que ?
Inessa05 [86]

Answer:

excuse me but where is the phrase?

7 0
2 years ago
Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that hi
tangare [24]

Answer:

The correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete because some important figures and points are missing in it. These figures and points are therefore provided to complete the question before answering it as follows:

Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that his marginal benefit from an additional soft drink is $100 and his marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza is $110. If the price of a soft drink is $2 and the price of a slice of pizza is $3, is Charley maximizing his total benefits?

A. No, he should increase his consumption of both goods.

B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

C. Yes, there is no other consumption choice that will make his total benefits greater.

D. No, he should shift consumption toward pizza and away from soft drinks to maximize total benefits.'

The explanation of the answer is now provided as follows:

Under utility maximization theory, the condition for the utility or benefit maximization for two goods is as follows:

MBs / Ps = MBp / Pp ……………………………. (1)

Where:

MBs = Marginal benefit from an additional soft drink = $100

MBp = Marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza =$110

Ps = Price of a soft drink = $2

Pp = Price of a slice of pizza = $3

Subtitling the relevant values, we have:

MBs / Ps = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft drinks = $100 / $2 = 50

MBp / Pp = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft pizza = $110 / $3 = 36.67

This implies that 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67

The decision rule is that the limited money income should be spent by a consumer on the good which gives the higher marginal utility per dollar in order to maximize marginal benefit.

Since 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67 above, this implies that Charley is NOT maximizing his total benefits. To maximize his total benefits, Charley should consume more of soft drinks and less of pizza until the condition is consistent with equation (1).

Therefore, the correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "suppose that over the course of a year 100 people are unemployed for 4 weeks each (the short-term unemployed), while 10 people
    13·1 answer
  • Ernest is 42 years old and has been out of work for two months. he lost his position as a program manager when his company merge
    14·1 answer
  • Beverly Foster is planning for her retirement. She has determined that her car is worth $10,000, her home is worth $150,000, her
    6·1 answer
  • On June ​1, High Performance Cell Phones sold 19,000 of merchandise to Anthony Trucking Company on account. Anthony fell on hard
    8·1 answer
  • Cars made in the United States by an American-owned company are included in______
    15·1 answer
  • mackenzie burrows $300 000 from the bank on a 30 year mortgage. she is given an interest rate of 5.125% apr. how much in total i
    12·1 answer
  • If an importer has a good reputation regarding its following of Customs regulations, the likelihood that one of its shipments is
    5·1 answer
  • You have been looking at several reports containing HRM metrics. You are a bit overwhelmed by all of the information. Then you r
    10·1 answer
  • In some cases oligopolies can benefit society by:
    6·1 answer
  • bledsoe Corporation has provided the following data for the month of November: Inventories: Beginning Ending Raw materials $ 26,
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!