Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
In the north east maybe!?
Answer: E. All of the above.
Explanation:
Lisa state here classifies her in all segment. Firstly, she's expectant and that's one of the requirements for the WIC for women which are pregnant. Secondly, she is a low income pregnant woman who's child is not up to 5years old and that's another requirement for the WIC loan, and finally the loan is for all children up to 5years and new mothers, she has a child and is a single mother.
Answer:
social loafing
Explanation:
Social loafing: In psychology, the term "social loafing" is defined as a process in which an individual generally exert very fewer efforts while doing a particular task if he or she is being surrounded with other people as well as when he or she is a specific group as a member of that group rather when he or she is working alone. The idea behind working in a specific group is to enhance an individual's skills or to get improved accomplishment related to a specific task by enriching the talents and skills of the different members of the group.
In the question above, the given statement is called social loafing.
