Answer:
Explanation:
By exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the Supreme Court has developed a large body of judicial decisions, or “precedents,” interpreting the Constitution. How the Court uses precedent to decide controversial issues has prompted debate over whether the Court should follow rules identified in prior decisions or overrule them. The Court’s treatment of precedent implicates longstanding questions about how the Court can maintain stability in the law by adhering to precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis while correcting decisions that rest on faulty reasoning, unworkable standards, abandoned legal doctrines, or outdated factual assumptions.
The boundaries of many world regions can be defined in several different ways, producing overlapping.
I believe we was a passenger on one of the hijacked planes on 9/11
Answer:
Underlying this theory was the belief that wealth was finite.
Explanation:
Mercantilism was the theory of trade espoused by the major European powers from roughly 1500 to 1800.It advocated that a nation should export more than it imported and accumulate bullion to make up the difference.