Answer:
True
Explanation:
I believe that the EU is helping with most of these Would you like to know what specifically the are doing?
<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
Here is the answer of the question above. The group of people that would have been most likely to support Watson and the populist party are the POOR FARMERS. Populist party, or also known as the People's party, is the movement made by farmers for ignoring their interests and difficulties. It was led by the brilliant orator Thomas E. Watson<span> in 1892. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Answer:
Option A, The federal budget had a surplus.
Explanation:
e2020 ✌
