We don't instead approach every issue from the perspective that "this is what I think given what I know or have experience of so far" because every person has their own perspective, ideas, and experiences.
If we start to approach every issue according to our own knowledge and experiences, we will be neglecting other persons' experiences that are equally important for them as our experiences are for us. We must give equal importance to other's knowledge as they may have more knowledge than we have.
It is a matter or respect and understanding between people. Every person has gone through something we might not and thus, every issue can not be approached on the basis of only one person's experiences and judgements.
To learn more about experiences here
brainly.com/question/1639543
#SPJ4
It reveals the people in his life, were not "good people" and so he didn't want to grow up to be like them. They were struggling and He didn't want to struggle like them.
Answer:
strong leaders kniw how to maintain order.
Explanation:
i just took the quiz
To get someone to do something or like someone trying to get you to buy something you don’t want
Answer:
The correct option is D (The interview provides first hand insight into marshals strengths and motivations while the information does not .)
Explanation:
The instructive content is the reason for the contentions in the meeting. "Equal with Justice Under Law" applies to everybody paying little respect to race and shading. In the meeting, the court case that was referred to was an unmistakable grandstand of correspondence and equity.
The educational content gives certainties and insights concerning Thur-good Marshall, while the meeting presents bits of knowledge into Marshall's contemplation's and inspirations.
By the way can you vote me brainlyest?
