Although the answer to this question will vary depending on your personal opinion, I would argue that this is not the case. I do not think that the use and abuse of the informal powers have created an imperial presidency.
The informal powers of the President are not especifically written out in the Constitution. Nevertheless, they are required to be used under certain specific circumstances. These are not meant to be used regularly, and they include the ability to enact a legislative agenda, executive orders, sending troops without a declaration of war and conducting certain foreign policy initiatives.
These informal powers, even in the present, are used only on very specific circumstances. Most of the time, the president only employs the powers that are given to him especifically by the Constitution. Therefore, informal powers still represent only a small part of the role of the president and of national legislation.
I recomend not using Wikipedia since not all its facts are true so maybe if you use a wesite with .org in it , it's better since the facts they give are way more true and logical.
Answer:
D He gave lands in the east to a co-emperor.
Explanation:
Diocletian named Maximian as August, a type of co-emperor, who help him to manage the Roman Empire.
Answer:
A revolutionary is a person who either participates in, or advocates a revolution. Also, when used as an adjective, the term revolutionary refers to something that has a major, sudden impact on society or on some aspect of human endeavor. Contents. 1 Definition; 2 Revolution and ideology; 3 See also; 4 References; 5 External ... He has no private interests, and no affairs
Explanation:
Ndia india i think not sure though