1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
3 years ago
15

Examine an argument made in public and translate its conclusion to show one of the four standard-form categorical propositions (

A, E, I, or O). Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Why or why not? Second, if its premises are true, what else can you infer about the conclusion? Analyze.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Varvara68 [4.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

A contention made in open that the security of our nation is compromised by psychological oppression; so the National Security Agency can catch our telephone calls.

The straight out recommendation utilized here is; specific confirmed for example a few people are psychological militant.

The end pursues the reason that the security of the nation is under risk so the telephone calls can be captured.

Since the reason is genuine we can derive that we should monitor the security of our country.

You might be interested in
If something is "relevant" to you,
katrin [286]
A. it's connected to the things that matter to you
8 0
3 years ago
who believed the president should be able to make any laws that he or she thinks is a good idea. A. Hobbes B. Locke C. Montesqui
ra1l [238]
I think c but I don’t k is
6 0
3 years ago
What is a basic principle of the Declaration of Independence
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

There are actually 4 principles.

Explanation:

1. All men are created equal (which is not even true because slavery and the treatment of women)

2. All people have basic rights that could not be revoked (Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness)

3. The government has the power to make the decisions

4. When the government doesn't protect its citizen's rights, it can be abolished by the people.

7 0
3 years ago
_____ statutes enable a court to serve a defendant outside the state as long as the defendant has sufficient minimum contacts wi
nordsb [41]

Answer:

long arm statutes

Explanation:

Long arm statutes -

It refers to the statute which enables personal jurisdiction by the court over an out-of-state defendant , is referred to as the long arm statutes .

The defender need to have some specific connection .

Hence , from the given information of the question ,

The correct answer is long arm statutes .

4 0
3 years ago
GRADE 5 SCIENCE MYA-2020-2021
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Our sun is closer to Earth

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was the fight over tariffs related to the issue of the states rights
    13·1 answer
  • _____ refers to the focusing of our limited capacities of consciousness on a particular set of stimuli.
    10·1 answer
  • Can writing develop identity according to psychology?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was Queen Hatshepsut’s tax policy significant?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the lives of the plebeians steadily change during the Roman Republic period?
    12·1 answer
  • According to what agreement would the United States have to declare war against any nation that attacked Great Britain?
    7·1 answer
  • Jeniffer didn’t have time to study for her history exam because she had two their tests and worked until 10 p.m. this is an exam
    8·1 answer
  • How to prove that I am me (by myself) . Give me ideas. I know that I am me but our homework is to prove it .But how ? I need adv
    7·1 answer
  • England won the French and Indian War. How do you think the United States would be different today if France had won the war?
    5·1 answer
  • Is spending for unemployment insurance mandatory or discretionary
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!