1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
10

A uniformed law enforcement officer working in the terminal building of an airline airport, outside the secured area, notices tw

o men who appear Middle Eastern entering a crowded airport restaurant. Both are carrying suitcases. As they pass close by him, they are conversing softly but excitedly in a language he thinks might be Arabic. They do not make eye contact with him. Can the officer legally: a. Stop the pair and question them? Explain. b. Frisk them for weapons? Explain. c. Search their bags for explosives? Explain.
Law
1 answer:
raketka [301]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Et interrogaverunt eos prohibere ad par

Explanation:

A DECIPIO potest interrogabant si vir bonus habeat ratio.

sry i have a tendency to type latin because i lived in greece for a bit and learned latin

You might be interested in
Which of the following contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt?
Sedaia [141]

The statement that contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt provided is that the "European demands for laborers in the New World."

This is evident in the fact that Queen Isabella said, "I command you to compel and oblige the said Indians to deal and associate with the Christians of the said island, to work in their buildings in collecting and mining gold and other metals, and to grow food and supplies for the Christian settlers and inhabitants of the said island."

The excerpt was culled from the letter of Queen Isabella to Nicolas de Ovando, governor of Hispaniola, in the year 1503.

During this period, the governor of Hispaniola in the New World sees the need for laborers in New Spain.

Queen Isabella made the Decree on Indian Labor, which approved the forced labor of Native Indians by the Spanish.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that at some point in New World, the Spanish saw the need for laborers to helped them settle in the continent.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/8364655

3 0
2 years ago
NEED HELP ASAP!!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!!! \
sineoko [7]

Answer:

The fourteenth amendment establishes birthright citizenship. Thismeans that any person born in the U.S. is considered a U.S. citizen and has the right of life,liberty and property.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“ to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers” - US constitution artic
RUDIKE [14]

The given quote is also known as the elastic clause because it gives Congress flexibility in the types of legislation that passes .

Answer: Option C  

<u>Explanation: </u>

Clause 18 of Section 8 of Article 1 of U.S. Constitution is also known as the ‘general clause’ or ‘elastic clause’ or ‘sweeping clause’ because it gives the legislature the power to make new legislation for exercising the powers provided in clause 1-17 of the Article.  

This clause act as a residuary power and comes to the aid of the Congress when any specific power is not bestowed under clause 1-17 but it is necessary to make law on the matter in order to exercise any power mentioned in preceding clauses.

3 0
3 years ago
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
3 years ago
2. What happened to savings in the United States? How did consumers contribute to this change?
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

What happened to savings in the United States?

Explanation:

The saving rate went from 10% savings rate to a negative savings rate. Consumers did this by binged buying items. Consumers would buy so many things that that weren't necessary, consumers supersized everything they had, instead of saving.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Murder,assault, and robbery are labeled what kind of crimes? Because they are committed against persons.
    10·1 answer
  • 50. Which of the following is NOT an Interest Group?<br> A. NRA<br> Β. ΑΜΑ<br> C. PETA<br> D. EPA
    14·1 answer
  • Reflections provide an occasion for insight and integration of the materials to which you have been exposed. They are also an op
    15·2 answers
  • If all proper hand washing steps are followed, how long should the entire process take? At least 20 seconds At most 2 minutes At
    10·1 answer
  • If a criminal robs a store with a gun what will he get charged
    5·2 answers
  • Policy implementation refers to the bureaucratic function of
    13·1 answer
  • Why do you think women, Aboriginals,
    5·1 answer
  • Discuss the effect of absence of rule of law​​
    15·1 answer
  • What is accuracy and provide a real-life example of law enforcement being accurate when using technical writing?
    5·1 answer
  • Approximately __% of vehicular collisions are the direct result of a vehicle skidding.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!