1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
5

The Sheriff's Department has information to believe that illegal automatic weapons are being hidden in a garage on Mary Halberst

am's property. The information was obtained from a confidential informant who specified that the illegal weapons were assault rifles and that Mary has secured ammunition for the weapons in hopes of arming her friends against a looming government conspiracy. The Sheriff's Department has a list of weapons that had been reported as stolen from a local gun store and the confidential informant confirmed those were the same weapons he had seen on Mary's property. Theinformant made a sworn statement in the form of affidavit that was presented to a judge,who issued a search warrant for "any and all illegal items" in the home and garage of Mary, listing her proper address. The Sheriff's Department executed a search warrant at Mary's home by forcing open her front door without knocking or announcing their presence and discovered the illegal weapons that matched the inventory from the Army Depot in her home and the garage.Mary challenges the search warrant as unconstitutional. She may succeed because:
a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause.
b. only the United States Army had authorization to investigate the case.
c. the search warrant did not adequately describe the things to be seized.
d. the affidavit was based on the word of a confidential informant.
Law
1 answer:
Allushta [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause

Explanation:

Wasnt Enough PC

You might be interested in
A bank lends money to a family so that it can buy a new house. This lets the family pay for the house over time instead of havin
inysia [295]

Answer:

standard deferred payment

Explanation:

just got it right on quiz

6 0
3 years ago
Escribe la terminación de los siguientes verbos:
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

can u plz type in english ?..............

5 0
3 years ago
An example of japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restrictions on korean rights was that
cestrela7 [59]

Answer: The Japanese Imperial rule took control of newspapers and human's right to free speech.

Explanation:

An example of Japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restricitons on Korean rights was that it assumed control of the newspapers in the country and disallowed the basic human right to free speech.

Additionally, it also forcefully suppressed the Korean nationalist groups.

5 0
3 years ago
The law making process is similar in the House and Senate with slight
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Both houses must accept the bill

Explanation:

Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.

6 0
2 years ago
The US Supreme Court hears a very limited number of cases every year, both civil and
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay, e.g., a stay of execution in a death penalty case. Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.

Explanation:

The Constitution states that the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court is the first, and only, Court to hear a case. The Constitution limits original jurisdiction cases to those involving disputes between the states or disputes arising among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers. Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.

idk if that helps at all, hopefully it helps a little...

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does a well-implemented safety and health program effect employee retention?
    9·1 answer
  • If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot re
    15·1 answer
  • Ronald Rawls and Zabian Bailey were in an auto accident in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bailey rear-ended Rawls at a stoplight. The
    15·1 answer
  • Explain a current bill working through the legislature and make an argument for or against the bill.
    15·1 answer
  • ______ normally are white rectangles with black letters or symbols.
    9·1 answer
  • Why is the medical examiners autopsy completed within 24 to 48 hours of a homicide?
    7·1 answer
  • President Obama was a member of the Democratic Party and is a-
    14·1 answer
  • What would be several advantages and disadvantages of living under a<br> Dictator?
    13·1 answer
  • Why do banks practice fractional reserve banking?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help answer this asap!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!