1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maks197457 [2]
3 years ago
12

Are there limits to the right to cure? Does a breaching party have the right to cure the breach, or can the non-breaching party

proceed directly to a damage claim?
Law
1 answer:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The overview of the particular question becomes demonstrated in the following portion on the clarification.

Explanation:

  • There seem to be limitations to something like the obligation to heal. Here rational duration seems to be the limit. An infringing party shall have the opportunity to remedy the infringement regardless of any non-confirmation given the period to fix or rectify the infringement having not terminated unless the infringing community notifies the non-infringing party of its determination to remedy the infringement and therefore remedies the infringement throughout the defined timeframe limits.
  • Furthermore, if there would be an infringement resulting from non-conformance but perhaps the infringing party believes that there would be no infringement and the solution would be appropriate also if the infringing party seasonally shall notify the non-infringing party that perhaps the infringing party seems to have a reasonable amount of time to remedy the infringement.
  • Therefore one thing becomes significant, the role including its defaulting party isn't constrained to healing by verifying requirements if it is suggested that fitting for the intent of healing is also part of the contract, therefore the party must ensure that healing suits the intention as well.
You might be interested in
1. Explain the interaction view of lawmaking and provide an example.
nordsb [41]

Answer:

1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .

6 0
3 years ago
Beethoven lost his hearing but continued to write music by doing what?
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I hope I helped!

6 0
3 years ago
What are some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force? How must the testing process be changed to ensure
lana [24]

Answer:

Good salary package, suitable environment.

Explanation:

Good salary package, suitable environment etc are the ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force. The testing process must be conducted under the supervision of fair officers in order to ensure that the women are not unfairly excluded from the force. Good salaries of police force will attract the female to join the police force. If the environment is suitable such as lack of sexual harassments and other activities etc also encourages the female recruits to join the police force.

3 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
•What is prisoner reentry?<br> •What are current issues and trends in parole and prisoner reentry?
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

Prisoner reentry is the process by which prisoners who have been released to return to Society.

I'm sorry, But I'm not so sure about the second one.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help.....ASAP
    12·2 answers
  • What is the difintion of law​
    9·1 answer
  • Which reason most closely illustrates why the national government was unable to maintain law and order under the Articles of Con
    10·2 answers
  • You answer a call from an existing client who has a hearing in 10 minutes. They are at the court house but they cannot find thei
    9·1 answer
  • Difference between Dan and bakas​
    14·1 answer
  • The English Bill of Rights of 1689 states, “That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, withou
    15·2 answers
  • Which numbered pair of phrases best completes this diagram of the
    14·2 answers
  • Yes or no; Is it possible to have as many representatives as people, if government wants to prevent abuse of power?
    7·1 answer
  • Help ASAP law ty thankssss !!!
    7·1 answer
  • vẽ sơ đồ mối liên hệ giữa các cơ quan thanh tra nhà nước. chỉ rõ mối liên hệ giữa các cơ quan thanh tra nhà nước
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!