Yes, in this way we become more open minded and take in validated ideas of others.
There are three broad types of nonexperimental research. Single-variable research focuses on a single variable rather than a relationship between variables. Correlational and quasi-experimentalresearch focus on a statistical relationship but lack manipulation or random assignment.
Answer and Explanation:
Intrinsic motivation: It will allow James to have confidence in his abilities and to believe that he will be able to overcome all the difficulties that may arise and that will try to prevent him from winning.
Epinephrine: It is the hormone that allows an individual's body to feel ready to do great things, which will generate very beneficial and great results.
Somatic nervous system: It will provide motor impulses to the muscles, allowing JAmes to perform the correct movements to achieve his goals.
Self-efficacy: It will allow James to believe that the commitment and effort he has had is sufficient to make him able to achieve his goals within the game.
Arousal theory: It will make James very excited to win the game, and can make him act inconsequential and very desperate, disrupting his performance.
Proactive interference: It can overload James' brain, making him forget essential information for the game to win.
External locus of control: It will make sure that James does not believe he is in control of the situation, causing him to not know what to do and to start acting unthinkingly.
Answer:
Having a mobile labor force helps keep unemployment low. It is important to an economy that people be willing and able to go where the jobs are located.
Explanation:
Answer:
The ethics of social consequences is a means of satisficing non-utilitarian consequentialism that can be used to approach disaster issues. The primary values in the ethics of social consequences are humanity, human dignity and moral rights, and these are developed and realized to achieve positive social consequences.Utilitarianism tells you to maximize utility; consequentialism, to maximize good consequences. In other words, a utilitarian who denies that what she should maximize, total utility, is identical to good consequences, is a non-consequentialist utilitarian. Such a utilitarian can be consistent.