Have a great day and have a nice sleep
There’s no answer tell me what it is
Answer:
Explanation:
Alright so the way to do this is to use properties of integrals to make our life easier.
So we have:
So lets break this up into two different integrals that represent the same area.
Lets think about what is going on up there. The integral from four to zero gives us the area under the curve of f(x) from four to zero. If we subtract this from the integral from one to zero (the area under f from one to zero) we are left with the area under f from four to one! Hence:
But since we have these values we can say that:
-3 - 2 = -5
Which means that = -5
So now we can evaluate
Lets first break up our integrand into two integrals
= 
Now we can evaluate this:
We know that = -5
So:
![3(-5)+2[x]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%28-5%29%2B2%5Bx%5D)
where x is evaluated at 4 to 1 so
-15 + 2(3)
So we are left with -15 + 6 = -9
Question:
If a personality survey with high internal consistency includes two different questions related to the personality dimension of agreeableness, then which of the following is true?
A) It is impossible to predict how people will answer the second question based on how they answered the first question
B) If people give an extreme answer to the first question, they will tend to give the opposite extreme answer to the second question
C) People will tend to give dissimilar answers to both questions.
D) People will tend to give similar answers to both questions
E) If people give a moderate answer to the first question, they will tend to give an extreme answer to the second question
Answer:
The correct choice is A)
Explanation:
The essence of having two different questions against a particular trait is to see to what degree the questions elicit the correct answer, (or help us understand the attributes of the test take). If it was possible to predict how both questions would be answered, then the purpose is defeated from the start.
Cheers!
