For 12 divided by 587, I got 0.02044293.
For 587 divided by 12, I got 48.9166666666666.
I hope this helps.
Answer: Verizon is less expensive than the S&P 500 on both a P/E and dividend yield basis.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a <em>Price to Earnings ratio is relatively high</em> this means that the <em>Price of the security is high </em>because investors believe the company has good prospects.
When a Dividend Yield is relatively low, this means that the dividends being declared are quite lower than the price because Dividend yield is dividends as a percentage of security price. <em>Lower Dividend Yields therefore mean high security prices</em>.
Looking at the Verizon Chart and the S&P 500 you see that Verizon P/E ratio is 11.71 while S&P is 19.01.
This means that the price of Verizon's is less than S&P 500.
Also notice that Verizon's Dividend yield is 4.09% while S&P 500's is 1.91% again signifying that Verizon is cheaper.
I have attached the full question.
Answer:
Vota Trump
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
population standard deviation does not differ from 0.25
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis :
σ² = 0.25²
σ² ≠ 0.25²
The Chisquare statistic, χ²: (n-1)*s²/σ²
Where s² = sample variance ; sample size, n = 30
Using calculator, the sample variance, s² = 0.1646
χ² = (n-1)*s²/σ²
χ²: (30 - 1) * 0.1646 / 0.25²
χ² = (29 * 0.1646) / 0.0625
χ² = 0.3292 / 0.0625
χ² = 5.2672
α = 0.05
Using the Pvalue from Chisquare calculator ; df = 29
Pvalue = 1
Since, Pvalue > α ; We fail to reject the null and conclude that population standard deviation does not differ from 0.25