Answer:
The correct answer is C. firm to the environment.
Explanation:
Currently, when a company begins its usual operations and the one that it will play day by day throughout its existence, it cannot leave aside knowing the role of its company, the environment in which it develops its function as a company or its operation with the environment , and it is essential that the company meets the social responsibility to which it is obliged.
It should always be taken into consideration that the life of the human being is greatly influenced and affected by the environment that surrounds it, so that the proper development and even its survival, depends entirely on the relationship between the company and The environment around us. And as with a coin, which has two sides, exactly the same thing happens between business and environment relationships, since on the one hand our environment provides us with the energy and resources we need to take advantage of them in Our business operations.
While on the other hand, man is also exposed to the possible aggressions that occur in the environment, as in the case of floods, pests, diseases, inclement weather or deprivation of resources, between others. The problem with this is that in our current society, the more it produces the more resources are needed, and the more it consumes the more waste and garbage is generated.
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer and Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1)
Cash flow Amount PV Factor at 10% for 8 annual installments Present Value
Installments $4,000 5.3349 $21,339.60
Down Payment $27,000 1 $27,000
Value of equipment $48,339.60
Refer to the PVIFA factor
2)
Table or calculator function FVAD of $
1
Future value $570,000
n = 5
i = 7.00%
Divided it by FV factor 6.1533
Annual Deposit $92,633.22
Refer to the FVAD table
3)
Table or calculator function PVAD of $
1
Payment $137,000
n = 20
i = 10.00%
Multiplied by PV factor 9.36492
Liability $1,282,994.04
Refer to the PVAD table
Answer:
Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
2018:
Accounts receivable (net) = $20
Net sales = $115
Cost of goods sold = $60
Net income = $20
Inventory turnover = 5.22
Return on equity = Return on assets × Equity multiple
= 10.3% × 2.36
= 24.308% or 24.3%
Therefore, Dowling's return on equity for 2018 is 24.3%.
<span>Marketing Myopia is the term for when a company does business in terms of goods and services instead of focusing on the benefits consumers are looking for. These companies are focused on the bottom line. It is considered a short-sighted view by most experts and often causes the companies in question to be unable to quickly adjust when there are changes in their particular markets.</span>
