The answer is true because empowerment is a positive thing which leads to a positive outcome.
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
Answer:
The answer is $56.68
Explanation:
Solution
We recall that:
The firm paid a dividend of =$7.80
The projected growth of dividends is at a rate = 9.0%
The annual return = 24.0%
Now,
V = ($7.80 * (1.09)/(.24 - 0.9)
= (8.502)/(.24-0.9)
= (8.502) * (-0.66)
= $56.68
Therefore, this would be the most we would pay for the stock. If we paid less than that, our return would be above the 24%.
Answer:
D. cascade down
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this is an example of MBO working as objectives cascade down through the organization. This can be said since the organizational goals/objectives start at the top of the organization (executives and managers) and move down through the organizational hierarchy to the lower level employees. Thus cascading down.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
