1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yanalaym [24]
3 years ago
14

Which 1896 supreme court decision approved segregation of blacks as long as separate but equal facilities were provided ?

History
2 answers:
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is:
Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. plessy v. Ferguson<span>, 163 US 537 1896 was a landmark constitutional law case of the </span>US Supreme Court<span>. It upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but eqeal.</span>

I hope this helps!
ozzi3 years ago
3 0
Plessy v. Ferguson.......

You might be interested in
Which of the three viewpoints would best serve the interests of African Americans?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

Du Bois agreed that self-improvement was a good idea, but that it should not happen.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can anyone please help me I am stuck on this problem on my independent study to go to hawaii help! What are the Six Essential El
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

The six essential elements are as follows:

The World in Spatial Terms: How are things spaced out, why are they spaced out that way

Places & Regions: Specific areas and what defines them.

Physical Systems: Physical Geography(mountains, rivers, etc)

Human Systems: Populations and how they interact (cultures, religions, economic activities, migration and their movements)

Environment and Society: I don't think this one needs an explanation

The Uses of Geography: Just as the name of this implies it's how geography is used.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these states would have been LEAST likely to contain Native American Reservations at the end of the nineteenth century?
kipiarov [429]
Its C.) Nevada........
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did lincoln delivered the emancipation proclamation?
melomori [17]
It was on <span>January 1, 1863 </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Give a small summary of the history of the period from 1933 to 1945 as it related to the Nazi persecution of the Jews.
    12·1 answer
  • 24 POINTS!!!!! NEED HELP NOW!!! Blank war considers Civilian targets as contributing to the cor civilian target as contributing
    15·1 answer
  • Why didn’t the twin towers just topple over and hit other buildings?
    8·1 answer
  • What led to a decline of partisanship after the War of 1812?
    6·1 answer
  • Which spheres of the Earth is most directly affected by<br> earthquakes and volcanoes?
    9·1 answer
  • In your opinion, how did dictators use the Great Depression to their advantage?
    11·1 answer
  • Malcolm X advocated black nationalism, self-determination, racial pride, self-respect, and the use of self-defense.
    11·1 answer
  • What if? the bill of rights had never been added to the constitution to change the constitution
    11·1 answer
  • who would be MOST likely to be responsible for making sure these expenditures are enforced in state government
    7·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!