Answer:
Charlene earns $700 per week
Kristi earns $550 per week
Sascha earns $800 per week
Step-by-step explanation:
Since Kristi earns 150 less than Charlene which is 100 less than Sascha, this is equal to the value of Sascha minus 250. We put this in the equation as s-250.
Together, they all earn $2050, so we must equal this to Charlene's value k+150, plus Kristi's value k, plus Sascha's value s.
<em>k+150+k+s=2050</em>
The next step here is to put the variables on one side and to put the numeric values on the other.
2k+s=1900
Like we said before, Kristi's value is equal to s-250, so we would replace k with that expression.
2(s-250)+s=1900
2s-500+s=1900
3s=2400
s= 800
We now have Sandra's weekly pay, which we can use to find the others' pay.
c= s-100
c= 800-100
c= 700
k= c-150
k= 700-150
k= 550
Answer: helllloooooooooooooo000000oooo
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
4.4* 1/3
4.4= 4 and 4/10 so 44/10*1/3= 44/30= 22/15
22/15
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Tamara's example is in fact an example that represents a linear functional relationship.
- This is because the cost of baby-sitting is linearly related to the amount of hours the nany spend with the child: the more hours the nany spends with the child, the higher the cost of baby-sitting, and this relation is constant: for every extra hour the cost increases at a constant rate of $6.5.
- If we want to represent the total cost of baby-sitting in a graph, taking the variable "y" as the total cost of baby-sitting and the variable "x" as the amount of hours the nany remains with the baby, y=5+6.5x (see the graph attached).
- The relation is linear because the cost increases proportionally with the amount of hours ($6.5 per hour).
- See table attached, were you can see the increses in total cost of baby sitting (y) when the amount of hours (x) increases.
Answer:
D im not sure just my opinion