1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
brilliants [131]
3 years ago
5

During slavery most african-americans who wanted to worship went to white churches or what

History
2 answers:
KengaRu [80]3 years ago
6 0

held their own services in  secret


lions [1.4K]3 years ago
3 0
They couldn’t go to church whatsoever. It was prohibited by their masters
You might be interested in
The primary purpose of the Marshall Plan was to
Aleonysh [2.5K]

To prevent the strengthening of the Soviet Union in Europe.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a major function of the president's cabinet?
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

B. To ensure that the president does not become too powerful

Explanation:

The main function entrusted to the cabinet is to participate in the task of ensuring continuity of the presidency of the United States. So officials closest to the head of state, included in the Cabinet, can attest to the inability of the US president to fulfill his duties.

As for the cabinet’s participation in the legislative process, the powers in this area are practically nullified. So the US President not only determines the legislative program, but also tightly controls the entire legislative process.  

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. With six points elaborate why it was difficult to stop slave trade in East Africa 19th Century? during 19th
Tcecarenko [31]
MPs

The main reason it took so long to abolish the slave trade was simply because the pro-slave trade lobby had too many important and powerful figures in the establishment. The plantation owners, the merchants and those living in Britain, some of them MP’s, were well organised, as well as being powerful and wealthy enough to bribe other MPs to support them.

Prime Minister William Pitt

William Pitt talks to the House of Commons about the French Declaration of Wars
William Pitt talks to the House of Commons about the French Declaration of Wars
The Prime Minister William Pitt had been a supporter of abolition, but the war with France changed his views. During the war he did not want to upset the cabinet ministers that were mostly against abolition. Therefore he withdrew his support for the abolitionists. Additionally the events in St Domingue convinced Pitt that to abolish slavery would be a disaster.

King George III

King George III was against the abolition movement, as was his son, the Duke of Clarence. Support for abolition in Parliament was now restricted to the committed few.

1806 Change of government

The new Prime Minister, Lord Grenville actively promoted fellow abolitionists to cabinet. More MPs had committed themselves to abolition during the 1805 election campaign.

1806 Parliamentary Bill

Poster advertising a meeting about abolishing slavery
The Foreign Slave Trade Abolition Bill of 1806 represented a change of strategy. Rather than have Wilberforce represent yet another straightforward abolition bill, the parliamentary abolitionists secretly agreed to pretend to 'ignore' a Foreign Slave Trade Abolition Bill, which was instead sold as an anti-French measure to the House of Commons.

The Bill was designed to prevent British merchants from importing slaves into the territories of foreign powers.

It was only on the third reading of the Bill, that the pro-slavery lobby realised what was really at stake behind the Bill. It would have been difficult to oppose it because the Government presented it as a way to win the Napoleonic war.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the rulers/leaders of Mali gain stature among Arabic states?
vlabodo [156]

Answer: Mali’s rulers adopted the title of ‘Mansa.  Mali’s founder, Sundiata, firmly established himself as a strong leader in both the religious and secular sense, claiming that he had a direct link to spirits of the land, thus making him the guardian of the ancestors. His empire extended from the fringes of the forest in the southwest through the grassland country of the Malinké to the Sahel and Southern Sahara ports of the Walatta and Tandmekka, and Arabic scholars estimate that Sundiata ruled for about 25 years and died in 1255.

Despite the great extent of the Empire of Mali it was often plagued by insufficient leadership. Yet Sundiata’s son Mansa Wali, who became the next King, is considered to have been one of the most powerful rulers of Mali.  Mansa Wali would, in turn, be succeeded by his brother Wati, who was succeeded by his brother called Kahlifa. Kahlifa was seen as a particularly bad ruler, and some chroniclers describe how he would use bows and arrows to kill people for entertainment. Because of his misrule, Kahlifa was deposed and replaced by a grandchild of Sundiata named Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr had been adopted by Sundiata as a son, although he was a grandchild and the son of Sundiata's daughter, which would have greatly strengthened his claim to the throne.

The leadership trouble in the Malian Empire would continue after the ascension of Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr was deposed in a coup by a man named Sakura, who was either a slave or a military commander. The low stature of Sakura perhaps implies that the royal family had lost much of its popularity amongst the common people. Sakura’s reign, however, would also be a troubled one; after he had converted to Islam, Sakura undertook a pilgrimage to Mecca but was killed by the Danakil people during his return journey while in the city of Tadjoura. It is disputed why Sakura was in Tadjoura, as it was not a natural route to take when returning from Mecca to Mali, and also for what reasons he was killed. Some suggest that he was killed because the Danakil wanted to steal his gold.

Sakura’s rise to power also shows us that the ruling family, and the Mansa, had limited power in the Empire of Mali and that the officers of the court wielded significant power in comparison. The Empire of Mali was organised into provinces with a strict hierarchical structure [xxxviii] in which each province had a Governor, and each town had a mayor or mochrif. Large armies were deployed to stop any rebellions in the smaller kingdoms and to safeguard the many trade routes. The decentralisation of power to lower levels of government bureaucracy through court officers, together with a strict hierarchical structure, was part of why the Malian Empire was so stable despite a series of bad rulers. Despite squabbles within the ruling family, the devolution of state administrative power through lower structures meant that the Empire could function quite well. In times of good rulers, the Empire would expand its territory, rendering it one of the largest Empires in West African history.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Ann [662]

Answer:

the answer is A..,,I took the test and its the correct answer

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What event led to the emergence of the Republican party? *
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways did the Native Americans resist the Indian Removal Act?
    8·1 answer
  • What did henry luce and henry wallace have in common? select one:
    8·1 answer
  • a form of government that seeks to build a strong country by emphasizing a national or ethnic identity is
    12·2 answers
  • What role did muckrakers play in raising social awareness of societal issues?
    10·1 answer
  • Which scandal was NOT associated with the Grant administration? A. the Crédit Mobilier Scandal B. the Indian Ring Scandal C. the
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the Pilgrims leave Europe to establish a new colony?
    11·1 answer
  • Explain Roosevelt's Legacy as a progressive president.
    14·1 answer
  • Look at the picture. please help me! :(
    11·2 answers
  • 5. In general, noblewomen in the Middle Ages were expected to: *
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!