Answer:
Assets increase by $10,000
Total stockholders' equity increases by $10,000
Explanation:
Since in the question, it is given that, the purchase value of equipment is $100,000 and the exchanged value is $110,000
So, the difference of $10,000 ($110,000 - $100,000) would reflect that the assets would increase by $10,000 and the total stockholders' equity is also increased by $10,000
The exchange value is a combination of $70,000 in trade allowance and $40,000 was paid in cash
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer: Decrease by $70000
Explanation:
Before the Barbecue Division is eliminated, the profit gotten will be:
Revenue from Barbecue Division sales = $510,000
Less: Salaries = $110000
Less: Direct material = $315000
Profit = $70000
Therefore, based on the analysis above, If Barbecue Division were eliminated, profitability would decrease by $70000
Answer: Free consent
Explanation:
According to the given question, in an organization the employees has the rights for knowing the job nature and this scenario reflect the basic right of free consent.
As, the free consent is basically refers to the legal term which is used for describing about the agreement between the two parties including all the terms and the conditions according to the section 13.
In the free consent agreement both the parties must be agree on all the conditions. Therefore, Free consent is the correct answer.
Answer:
It is better for Frank, to go for a line of credit
Explanation:
It is better for Frank, to go for a line of credit, as this will enable him to have the lowest interest payment. This will also help him to draw for his services and also enable him to be repaying the in small amounts so that the operations are not affected.
