Answer:
Yes, because the corporation remains liable to the owner under the contract
Explanation:
The above answer is true because in this case, there is no limit to the assignment of the contractual rights between the two parties, hence this assignment of a contract would be treated as both an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties.
Therefore, while the corporation in this case has delegated its duties and assigned its rights under the contract to the developer by assigning the contract to the developer, the corporation is still considered to be liable to the owner for payment of the purchase price.
And given the fact that the developer is not as creditworthy as the corporation, and thus there is a greater chance that the developer will be unable to pay the purchase price, the owner has the rights under the contract arrangement to contractually compel the corporation to do so.
Answer:
a. $9,857.25
Explanation:
Price = Face value * (1 - Bid*Days/360)
Price = $10,000 * (1 - 5.71%*90/360)
Price = $10,000 * (1 - 5.71%*0.25)
Price = $10,000 * (1 - 0.014275)
Price = $10,000 * 0.985725
Price = $9,857.25
Answer:
Dr Deferred Tax Liability $3,750,000
Cr Income Tax Benefit-Operating Loss $3,750,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that net operating loss of the amount of $15 million was reported for financial reporting and tax purposes in which the tax rate is 25%. Therefore the journal entry to recognize the income tax benefit of the net operating loss will be :
Dr Deferred Tax Liability $3,750,000
Cr Income Tax Benefit-Operating Loss $3,750,000
($15 million *25%)
Answer:
The answers are attached in the following two images.
Explanation:
Consider the data provided by you. The solution of the problems are attached below with the explanations necessary to resolve the problems. If you have any question please ask.
