A: the right to confront witness
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (plaintiff) accused Henson of an attack by way of a risky weapon. By the end of the trial, Henson moved for a directed verdict. The trial court denied the motion, and the jury convicted Henson of attack by way of a risky weapon.
<h3>What is the meaning of trial in law?</h3>
The trial is a dependent technique wherein the information of a case is offered to a jury, and that they determine if the defendant is responsible or now no longer responsible for the price offered.
During the trial, the prosecutor makes use of witnesses and proof to show to the jury that the defendant dedicated the crime(s).
Thus, By the end of the trial, Henson moved for a directed verdict. The trial court denied the motion, and the jury convicted Henson of attack by way of a risky weapon.
learn more about Commonwealth vs. Albert J. Henson:
brainly.com/question/27961073
#SPJ1
He has a warrant only for drugs so the knife and painting is out of option but a gun can be used to traffic drugs they can hide a little baggy of meth or crack in the chamber other than that he’s not permitted to take anything I think
Answer:
i think its A or B. probably A but im not 100% sure
Explanation:
