The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be the "Federal Trade Commission Act".
Explanation:
- A federal law enacted in the U.S to establish the Federal Trade Commission that would provide the American government with a full series of legal measures that could be used against anti-competitive, discriminatory and misleading market activities.
- The FTC wants to enforce federal consumer laws to protect privacy and abuse, frustration, and unreasonable activity.
Therefore, FTC is the right answer.
Answer:
B. prior DUI convictions
Explanation:
Florida's progressive DUI laws take prior DUI convictions into account.
I would say interest groups
