All categories

2 years ago

Is the Supreme Courts interpretation of the 14th Amendment and use of selective incorporation a

Law

1 answer:

hram777 [196]2 years ago

7 0

Answer and Explanation:

The 14th amendment cannot be a violation of the concept of federalism, as federalism is in accordance with the concepts covered in the Bill of Rights and only allows for the separation and sharing of powers between state and federal governments if this does not hurt the concepts covered by the Bill of Rights. These concepts are strengthened with the 14th amendment and for this reason, we should not consider that this amendment could harm the concept of federalism.

The ability of a state to create its own laws must be maintained even if people can move from one state to another, because this allows states to organize and maintain order in their territories, independent of their inhabitants. In this case, the individual who is moving from state to state must adapt to the laws of the territory, so that he/she can remain in the place.

You might be interested in

You switch a track to save 5 innocent people or let them die, what would you do

Temka [501]

Answer:

I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Another name for legal penalties is

Kaylis [27]

The correct answer is c. Jail term

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Economic Survey

artcher [175]

The case portrays the need for a review of income and property taxes, highlighting information on which taxes should or should not have their exemption limits extended and how this affects the country's infrastructure.

Accordingly, we can answer the other questions as follows:

Economic research is against increasing the income tax exemption limit, as this would harm the poorest population.
The research states that the property tax is important for the growth of the country's infrastructure, in addition to falling on objects that are easy to identify and that belong to the richest population.

<h3>How does the survey present this information?</h3>

The research shows that the income import should matter the exemption in the poorest population and this is a way to promote more taxpayers for this tax. This is because by allowing poor people to be exempt from income tax, the State promotes economic ascension, allowing these people to reach higher economic levels and leave the lower classes, becoming taxpayers.

However, the research is in favor of extending the exemption limits for property tax. This is because these taxes must fall on people who own buildings and residences. These people have a higher economic standard and are easily identified since the properties are immovable assets.

Learn more about income tax:

brainly.com/question/17075354

#SPJ1

4 0

1 year ago

Which of the following is not one of the three branches of the US CJS?

stepan [7]

Answer:

the answer is corrections

6 0

2 years ago

Ann lives in a state that has a 2 year statute of limitations and a 10 year statute of repose on negligence cases. Two bad thing

grandymaker [24]

Answer:

Yes, against Sally only.

Explanation:

With the information given in the question, Ann´s lawsuit will not proceed after Donny´s defendant raise the defenses of limitations.

A statute of limitations looks to set a maximum time after which an event could be legally imported and a lawsuit against it will pass.

A statute of repose limits the time that an action could be brought back because of a particular event.

The bad things that happened to Ann were in 2018 so, for the car accident she had until 2020 to initiate a lawsuit.

On the other hand, the statute of repose began to run once the affected notice the problem that the particular event, in this case, the negligence from Sally, is caused. Ann noticed the pain on her elbow in 2020 so she had until 2030 to initiate a lawsuit.

I hope this answer helps you.

4 0

3 years ago