1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notsponge [240]
3 years ago
14

The War of 1812 was also known as A. "the second war of independence." B. "the war to end all wars." C. "the war for American id

entity." D. "the second war for the west."
History
1 answer:
Ray Of Light [21]3 years ago
3 0

The answer is A, because the War of 1812 was the second war America fought for independence.

You might be interested in
What were the 4 main justifications the President used to promote a U.S. declaration of War in his address to Congress?
Lynna [10]
Ask this question again, you're going to need a more specific time the president has done this. however, if you are asking about WWI, the USS Lusitania, the Zimmerman Telegram, German U Boats targeting American ships, and so on.
5 0
3 years ago
When President Truman took a hard line against striking workers in the years immediately following World War II, he showed that
Zarrin [17]
President Truman was a very no-nonsense man. His famous quote "The buck stops here" showed that. hope that helps and good luck 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In October 1844, President Houston met with leaders of the Comanche and ten other Native American groups and told them - Select
Andreyy89

Answer: He wanted to make peace.

Explanation:

The reason for President Houston meeting with the leaders of the Comanche and ten other Native American groups in October 1844 was to make peace.

The president met with the leaders which also included Buffalo Hump, so that a boundary would be established whereby the Comanches will be allowed to roam and also the Texans will be allowed to live in peace.

5 0
2 years ago
How does Wallace’s description of American foreign policy compare to Truman’s and Novikov’s?
Digiron [165]
Henry Wallace's description of American foreign policy was somewhere between the positions of President Truman and Soviet ambassador Novikov.  Wallace acknowledged that America's policy was an attempt to establish and safeguard democracy in other nations.  But he also noted that attempts to do so in Eastern Europe would inevitably be seen by the Soviets as a threat to their security, even as an attempt to destroy the Soviet Union.    

President Truman's position (as stated in the speech in March, 1947, in which he laid out the "Truman Doctrine"), was that those who supported a free and democratic way of life had to oppose governments that forced the will of a minority upon the rest of society by oppression and by controlling the media and suppressing dissent.  

Soviet ambassador Nikolai Novikov went as far as to accuse the Americans of imperialism as the essence of their foreign policy, in the telegram he sent sent to the Soviet leadership in September, 1946.

Henry Wallace had been Vice-President of the United States under Franklin D. Roosevelt from 1941-1945, prior to Harry Truman serving in that role.  When Truman became president after FDR's death, Wallace served in the Truman administration as Secretary of Commerce.  After his letter to President Truman in July, 1946, and other controversial comments he made, Truman dismissed Wallace from his administration (in September, 1946).  Truman and Wallace definitely did not see eye-to-eye on foreign policy, especially in regard to the Soviet Union.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the actions of each group or person that led to the fall of the western Roman Empire.
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

Roman Government- levied heavy taxes on people

Roman Emperors-fought among themselves

Barbarian tribes-disrupted trade routes

Explanation:

  • According to the late fourth-century author Vegetius, troops wore armor up to the reign of Gratian, when they began to complain about how heavy it was and asked the emperor to forbid them from wearing it. Although historians debate this, Egypt, which was a part of the more prosperous Eastern Roman Empire, is the only location where Roman armor from the fifth century has been discovered.
  • After the division of the empire in 395, the West fared poorly. Prior East-West partitions had given the West the important province of Illyricum (modern Yugoslavia more or less). According to records, Gaul and Illyricum accounted for 56% of military recruitment between 284 and 476. In fact, helping to reclaim Illyricum to use for military recruiting was one of the reasons the Roman commander Stillicho attempted to form an alliance with the Gothic king Alaric. It was difficult to raise enough taxes to support a sizable military army due to the loss of wealthier provinces like Egypt to the Eastern empire and the fact that Gaul's economy had not yet recovered from the devastation of its towns during the Crisis of the Third Century.
  • When Theodosius' East Roman forces beat the Western army, it was still reeling from the disastrous loss at the Battle of Frigidus River.
  • Barbarian tribes with conflicted allegiance made up the majority of the army in the fifth century. The Suevic king Rechiar and a Gothic princess had a son named Ricimer. He killed the emperor when Majorian returned home from his expedition in North Africa against the Vandals. Perhaps he had grudges against Majorian for retaking Spain from the Sueves and the Goths (which collapsed against after his death). With the brief exception of Anthemius, who was imposed on the West by an Eastern Roman army, Ricimer governed through puppet emperors until his death in 472. After Anthemius killed himself by killing a follower of his named Romanus, Ricimer and Anthemius engaged in a civil war. Before the Eastern empire launched another expedition, Gundobad—the subsequent military leader and Ricimer's nephew—appointed Glycerius as the western emperor and departed Italy to become the Burgundians' king. During his brief reign as emperor in 475, Julius Nepos named Roman Orestes as Magister Militum (commander in chief of the army) and appointed him to rule over what was left of Roman Gaul (Provence). However, he abandoned Gaul and struck a deal with the barbarians in which he asked them to support him as emperor in exchange for one-third of Italy. After being expelled from Italy, Julius Nepos went to Dalmatia, where he was killed in 480. The western kingdom was toppled in 476 when Orestes betrayed his pledges to the barbarians. Odovocar, the barbarian ruler of Italy (perhaps from the Heruli tribe), put an end to the empire in the west.

Thanks,

Eddie

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The United States supported a system that allowed American business owners to fund, build, and profit from factories in the nati
    13·1 answer
  • Which major event most contributed to the spread of Buddhism
    15·1 answer
  • Barney leaves a bar and 2am and gets arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. He will first be subject to...
    14·2 answers
  • The diagram below shows that the Roman Republic contributed to the development of democratic principles.
    14·2 answers
  • Who was Johann Tetzel? What problem did Luther have with him?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST summarizes Section 1 of the 25th Amendment?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was Stephen Austin able to establish a colony in Mexican territory?
    8·2 answers
  • The options in the drop down menu are 1) central asia , east asia , west asia.
    13·1 answer
  • The president would like to use more money to fight terrorism. To do so, he wants to raise income taxes. He needs to ask someone
    13·1 answer
  • After the battle of the Marne in 1914, German forces realized that victory…
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!