Answer:
(a): y increases on average by 8.63/unit of x1 in the first equation and increases on average by 9.01/unit of x1 in the second
(b): Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Given


Solving (a): An interpretation of x1 coefficient
We have the coefficients of x1 to be 8.63 and 9.01
Literally, the coefficient represents the average change of y-variable per unit increase of the dependent variable
Since the coefficients of x1 in both equations are positive, then that represents an increment on the y variable.
So, the interpretation is:
y increases on average by 8.63/unit of x1 in the first equation and increases on average by 9.01/unit of x1 in the second
Solving (b): Multicollinearity
This could be the cause because x1 and x2 are related and as a result, x2 could take a part of the coefficient of x2
Answer:
D. Dilation, sorry if i'm wrong ;)
Step-by-step explanation:
Because of the symmetry of the parabola, its stationary point will always be in the middle of its x-intercepts (or zeroes). ...
Your 71,1482 doesn't make sense. But regardless,
let x = the other car's cost.
You know the total spent and the cost of one car. So logically, if you subtract the two you'd get the price of the second car.
You can do $38,295 + c = $71,1482.
Or $71,1482 - $38,295 = c.
Answer:
3y -- 6
Step-by-step explanation:
if the largest number is y, then the other two integers would be (y -- 2) and (y -- 4).
Therefore the sum of the integers would be
y + (y -- 2) + (y -- 4) = 3y -- 6.