Magna Carta, written in 1215, established the belief that the monarch's rule was not absolute and provided the basis for the later development of parliament.<span> The document only forced King John to consult nobles before he made arbitrary decisions like passing taxes.</span>
The answer is values drift. Amy fails to be honest to her
line or field of work because of the atmosphere in which is an example of
values drift. Values drift is a way of having to drive the values away because
of certain actions in which these values that are used to be done or practice
is slowly fading or is not being done anymore.
Answer:
It eliminates the abnormal heart rate.
Explanation:
The Chain of Survival should be applied when a patient is under cardiac arrest.
Cardiac arrest is mostly caused due to abnormal electrical activity in the victim's heart. This can result in ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia which, if not treated, could cause death.
An automated external defibrillator (AED) is designed to restore the heart's regular activity, by providing a heavy electric shock to the patient's chest. This a vital step in the chain of survival as it greatly increases the chances of survival.
Answer:
operant conditioning
Explanation:
To maintain a non-violent atmosphere in her classroom, Mrs. Elliot gives one golden star to every student who plays nicely with the other students. Mrs. Elliot's actions are in line with operant conditioning .Operant conditioning sometimes referred to as instrumental conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. Through operant conditioning, an association is made between a behavior and a consequence for that behavior. By contrast, every student who plays nicely with the other students will Mrs Eliot give one golden star to.
Answer:
<em>Research </em>is a <em>process of generating new knowledge about a specific subject by acquiring new information, analyzing it and putting it into the framework of existing knowledge in order to make new conclusions.
</em>
Let us take as an <u>example </u>the salient issue of electronic cigarettes. Being on the market in many countries for several years now, e-cigarettes have both their supporters and opposers. Some people <u>claim</u> that e-cigarettes is a good alternative to smoking tobacco and while they can be harmful they are less harmful than tobacco. Some people share an <u>opinion</u> that e-cigarettes are dangerous and should be banned.
Only <u>research </u>can educate both of these opinions with validated scientific outcomes. That is why so many institutions are currently running extensive research on the impact of e-cigarettes on human health. Until robust scientific data is collected, which takes a lot of time with subjects that are expected to have a long-term effect on human health, ideas in favor or against will prevail the agenda on this subject. Moreover, the lack of research can result in fear mongering <u>ideas</u> about e-cigarettes, or opposite to that, fashion to use e-cigarettes among people who were not smoking tobacco before.
