Answer: Most historians agree that American involvement in World War I was inevitable by early 1917, but the march to war was no doubt accelerated by a notorious letter penned by German foreign secretary Arthur Zimmermann. On January 16, 1917, British code breakers intercepted an encrypted message from Zimmermann intended for Heinrich von Eckardt, the German ambassador to Mexico. The missive gave the ambassador a now-famous set of instructions: if the neutral United States entered the war on the side of the Allies, Von Eckardt was to approach Mexico’s president with an offer to forge a secret wartime alliance. The Germans would provide military and financial support for a Mexican attack on the United States, and in exchange Mexico would be free to annex “lost territory in Texas, New Mexico and Arizona.” In addition, Von Eckardt was told to use the Mexicans as a go-between to entice the Japanese Empire to join the German cause.
Explanation:
It might be right i dont know
I think you really liked the picture
Answer:
When the issue of whether the federally-chartered bank could be taxed by the state, the U.S. Supreme Court voted unanimously that Congress had the power to establish the bank, and that Maryland did not have the power to tax it. ... This is one of many examples of the Elastic Clause working in Congress' favor.
Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, the 13th amendment abolished slavery in the United States and provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States.
Answer:
No taxation without representation
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliaments in 1765 which involves the imposition of direct taxes on the American colonies.
However, in their attempt to negotiate the Stamp Act and the notion that the Act was harsh, the American colonists demanded that they will not pay the taxes except they are part of the governing body which was having representatives in the British parliament to make the decision.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "No taxation without representation."
