We can simply observe that.
- 0.777... is rational, because it is a number with infinite but repeating decimal part.
- 1/3 is rational, because it's the division between two integers
, so this is rational as well.
Since the product of two rational numbers is always rational, we have that

are all rationals, since they are the product of two rationals.
On the other hand, we have

and thus

which is irrational.
Answer:
Maybe 74
Step-by-step explanation:
42+64=106
180-106=74
Firstly, I noticed that there are fractions, decimals, and percents. I will change everything to percents, so it’s more easy for me to compare each of them.
List 1. 140%, 25%, 14%. This is from greatest to least, not least to greatest.
List 2. 25%, 14%, 14%. This is not from least to greatest, either.
List 3. 14%, 25%, 140%. This is from least to greatest.
List 4. 140%, 14%, 25%. This is not from least to greatest.
List 3 is from least to greatest. I got this answer by converting all of the fractions and decimals to percentages.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given a ΔLMN.
Line LN is extended to point O.
such that:

and

To find:

Solution:
Kindly refer to the attached image for the given triangle and dimensions of angles.
Let us recall the external angle property of a triangle:
The external angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of two opposite internal angles.
i.e.

Putting the value of
in
.

Answer:
A system of linear equations will have exactly one point of intersection, for example:
2x+y=5
-x+y=2
However, a system of linear equations with no solution will have no points of intersection, for example:
-4x+10y=6
2x-5y=3
Sorry about c. though I'm confused on how a pair of equations can have infinite points of intersection unless x or y equals all real numbers which could happen if x or y both equaled all real numbers maybe
And the point of interesection for the system of equations in the problem you attached as an image is (2,-1)
I attached a photo below, and one of how to graph it