-No clear separation of governmental powers

History

1 answer:

n200080 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Constitutional monarchy.

Explanation:

A Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which monarch– King or Queen, shares power with the Consitutionalized form of government. In such form of government, the King or Queen act as a head of the state, whereas the the Prime Minister act as a head of the government.

The powers of monarchs in the Constitutional monarchy is either limited or ceremonial. Whereas the powers vested to the Prime Minister are excersied accordingly. The examples of such form of government includes UK, Australia, and Belgium.

Therefore, the Constitutional monarchy is the correct answer.

You might be interested in

Why did Lech Walesa win a Nobel Peace Prize in 1983?

Orlov [11]

The correct answer is D.

Lech Walesa (born in 1943) is a Polish politician and labour activist. He founded and leaded <em>Solidarity</em> the first free labor union in the Soviet bloc. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1983 and became president of Poland in 1990 until 1995.

The reasons why he was awarded the Nobel Prize was because he developed mechanisms for peaceful resolution of labor issues in his country. He established networks for negotiations and cooperation between the government and the unions, specifically his organization called <em><u>Solidarity</u></em>. He attempted to solve problems through peaceful initiatives, while surrounded by a world in constant tension due to the Cold War scenario. His behaviour set a model to be followed and this is why the committee decided to give him the award.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0

3 years ago

Which phrases accuratley describe the roman republic?

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Which of these choices was not a duty of the Assembly?

galina1969 [7]

<span>c running the army is the correct answer</span>

5 0