Answer:
c. There is an "opportunity cost" associated with using reinvested earnings, hence they are not "free."
Explanation:
When the reinvested earnings are invested that is basically the earnings associated with reinvestment would earn the same like that earned by the investment if not withdrawn and invested.
Let us say for example: Amount invested = $1,000
Return on such investment = $100
Now if such earnings are also reinvested then
Earnings = $110
Now if this $110 is used rather than investing again, then there is the opportunity cost of earning $11 on such reinvestment.
Thus, statement c is correct.
Answer:
The answer is: letter c, a recycling program
Explanation:
A "free-rider" problem happens when <em>some members in the society don't contribute an equal share in the cost of a shared resource. </em>
Among the choices above, the recycling program will give rise to such situation. For example, when it comes to a recycling program of making a school's wall out of recycled bottles (in order to protect it from outsiders), not everyone will join the program yet, most of the time, the program is done for the good of the society. In this case, for the good of the school and the people visiting it.
This results to many free riders taking advantage of the school's wall, including the people who visits the school (parents, babysitters, friends, guardians etc.) and loiters in the area to pass time while waiting for their kids or friends
Answer:
many buyers and sellers
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this situation violates the perfect competition assumption of many buyers and sellers. This is a model that many buyers and sellers in a competitive market agree on a single market price, and that no individual has influence over the price. Therefore if a single company, like Dell in this scenario, is able to influence the price then it is violating this assumption.
Answer:
Sunk cost
Explanation:
The sunken cost is the expense previously incurred that will not be compensated in future. Plus, it's also called past expense.
The cost at the time of decision-making is not significant and it should be ignored.
In the given question, the $3,500 spent which is not now recovered and hence represents the sunk cost
The answer to the question is (B) least preferred coworker scale.
Fiedler uses this for his contingency leadership model, which describes how the best leader is the ones who showcased the best behaviors to manage the circumstances that he or she finds themselves in.
The LPC (least-preferred coworker scale) <u>measures an individual’s leadership orientation, where high scores have high human relations orientation and low scorers have high task orientation.</u>
