Answer:
cuvuvigigigigig88g8gigigig8fi
Answer:
B. Implied warranty of fitness
Explanation:
An implied warranty of fitness for an specific purpose refers to the fact that if the seller of a product knows that the product will be used for an specific purpose and that the buyer is purchasing that product for that using it that way, then an implied warranty of fitness is formed. In this case, the seller knew that Palmer was going to carry 5,000 pounds in the truck and therefore, by offering a certain truck to Palmer, an implied warranty of fitness was formed stating that the truck could carry that load.
Answer:
d.mitigating
Explanation:
This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.
Answer:
a. The return predicted by CAPM for a portfolio with a beta of 1.4 is 11.88%
b. The alpha of portfolio A is -3.68%
Explanation:
The formula for computing the return by Capital Assets Pricing Method (CAPM) model.
Expected return = Risk Free rate + (Beta × Market Risk Premium)
where,
Market risk premium = market return - risk free rate
Now, putting the values in the above equation
a. Expected return = 0.06 + 1.4 × (0.102 - 0.06)
= 0.06 + 1.4 × 0.042
= 0.06 + 0.0588
= 0.1188
= 11.88 %
Thus, the return predicted by CAPM for a portfolio with a beta of 1.4 is 11.88%.
b. The alpha should be = Portfolio expected return - expected return
= 8.20 - 11.88 %
= -3.68%
Thus, the alpha of portfolio A is -3.68%