Answer:
The answer is: remain the same
Explanation:
The marginal utility of a good or service is how much better we feel when consuming an extra unit of that good or service. For example if we are very thirsty, the marginal utility of consuming a can of Coke is very large, but once our thirst is quenched, an extra can of Coke will not provide use with that much satisfaction as before.
If the price of a substitute good increases, the marginal utility of the good whose price didn't change, will remain the same.
Let's go back to the Coke example. An extra can of Coke will give me 5 more satisfaction units (I'm assuming I can measure satisfaction) and an extra slice of pizza will give me 7 more units of satisfaction. If the price of Coke increases from 50 cents to $1, its marginal utility will decrease. I will buy more pizza because the satisfaction I get from drinking Coke is now smaller.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Sales = 747300
Less: Costs = 582600
Less: Depreciation = 89300
EBIT = 75400
Less: Taxes at 22% = 22% × 75400 = 16588
Net income = EBIT - Taxes = 75400 - 16588 = 58812
a. Calculate the OCF.
OCF will be calculated as:
= Net income + Depreciation
= 58812 + 89300
= 148,112
b. What is the depreciation tax shield?
Depreciation tax shield will be:
= Depreciation × Tax rate
= 89300 × 22%
= 89300 × 0.22
= 19646
Answer: <em>Option (C) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
<em>A recurrent conclusion of injuries occurred while falling is a long-term pain, medication for these are not taken in consideration among intermediate per-person costs of emergency cure for aged or old individuals's laceration from such falls</em>, if true, will have the tendency to seriously undermines conclusion of argument given in the comprehension.
This states that argument given in the comprehension has not taken in consideration cost for medicine which overall will increase cost. Thereby with an increase in cost the given statement will become untrue since the cost of surgery and medicine combined is higher than cost, in such a case treatment would be more economical. Therefore it undermines conclusion of argument.
Answer:
The solution to this question can be defined as follows:
Explanation:
In point a:
When consumer interest decreases, => consumers begin and save less and more, => MPC decreases; => the "IS" curve becomes flatter; => "IS" turns inside. Currently, 'AD' shows together all the goods and financial sector, => as the 'IS' curve adjusts inside the industry, => the 'AD' would also change to the left.
In point b:
Take into account the SR models of "IS-LM" and "AD-AS."
Therefore there is the case of a full job only at the beginning; => its optimum between "IS1" and "LM" in the "IS-LM" model; as well as the main equilibrium among "AD1" and "AS" in the "AD-AS" model "E1'," => the original equilibrium among "Y=Yf," "r=r1" and "P=P1." That now the consumer is reducing the confidence, => the 'IS' curve becomes shifting IMEI 'IS2,' => provided the 'LM' curve, that new balance is 'E2.' That's why the price in the SR is calculated, the AS will change =>, however, the AD also will shift the "AD2" side and "E2'" will become the equilibrium point in the "AD-AS" system, "r=r2 <r1" and "P=P1" throughout the new "Y=Y2 <Yf" balance.
Please find the graph file in the attachment.
