This is a delightful and witty short story with that very Russian sense of the surreal combined with satire, that one sees in Bulgakov's writings (Bulgakov was an admirer of Gogol's work). I could go into all sorts of linguistic and psychological analysis of the symbolism of a man losing his nose, or I probably could if I knew Russian. But I suspect that rather misses the point. As the story says: Nonsense really does occur in this world, and, sometimes, nonsense altogether without an element of plausibility. I do not know what you can compare it with. Have you got any options? I think that you can get help with it if you check i tat the professional site. Prime Writings is the site with interesting blog on essay writing.
A person can make a book review of a story based on the content of the book and he can do this by:
- Making a blurb that includes the information of the book
- State the diction used by the author
- Mention the conflict(s) and how they advance the plot
- Mention any moral lessons from the story, if any.
- Make your conclusion about it, if it's a good read or not.
<h3>What is a Perspective?</h3>
This refers to the viewpoint that is used to tell a story that is unique to a person and is usually non-objective because there is the presence of bias.
Hence, we can see that I can infer that you need to make a book review of particular literature and you need to carefully read and understand the text before you proceed to make a review of it.
You would also need to write a script and make an adaption of the book you've just reviewed and this would require the use of stage directions to direct the cast and also the background crew.
Please note that your question is incomplete, so a general overview was given.
Read more about book review here:
brainly.com/question/1103504
#SPJ1
Answers: Eric Christ's interpretation: Key points: Direct link to Mc Carthy, easily understood, "Witch Hunt", Realized that it was link to "un-American trials", "statement of unlimited power wielded by apparently well-meaning albeit paranoid and delusional individuals.
Wade Bradford's interpretation: Key points: Shows no link to Joseph Mc Carthur, believes the facts written were directly about the puritan people in Salen Massachussetes.
Explanation: In the first interpretation there is a strong link to Joseph McCarthy but in the other there is no link. From my point of view, the interpretation that changes the original idea is the second because this play should be understood in the context in which it was written and that was a moment that McCarthysm untied a truly witch hunt in American's society
The line that describes the setting is “ and that very night, as we lay packed tight in our robes beneath the snow, and the dogs were fed, and the stars or head were dancing heel and toe.”
This line describes the time of day, the clothing worn by the characters, the weather conditions and season, and the surrounding dogs and stars with personification.