Answer:
An example of production under the command system in the United States is that of the production of roads and passable roads throughout the nation. In this case, it is the production of a public service, and as such it is controlled by the government in all stages of its production: from the identification of the need, through the tender, the construction authorization and the supervision of the results, everything is controlled by the government. This implies that individuals or private companies cannot by their own initiative create this type of road, but rather depend exclusively on the will of the government.
Based on the scenario above, Janet can be regarded as an Free-rein learder. Janet has the authority style where subordinates are not straightforwardly managed and rather should work on possess and demonstrate their value through achievements. No particular supervisory criteria must be met.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
According to the Consider This box about hypothetical countries Slogo, Sumgo, and Speedo, small differences in economic growth rates make for large differences in real GDP per capita over several decades, assuming the same growth of population for each country.
For small countries ( less population and same growth of population over the years) even small growth rates makes a large change in real GDP per capita over the years.
<span>A good rule of thumb is to limit consumer credit payments to 20% percent of your net monthly income.</span>
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
