The Doctrine of Nullification suggested that states residing within the Union have the unilateral, inherent (natural, undocumented) right to void any law created by the federal government that could be deemed unconstitutional.
There are numerous opinions on this. Some people believed that through the control of media on a global scale, the media could be used to culturally imperialize other countries. Another is that they would be able to spread falsities since there would be no other media, and the global media would have their own agenda based around who's their owned or who's paying them or similar things.
Three of the common characteristics of hunter-gatherer communities were that there was no division of labor, they were often nomadic, and the men did almost all of the hunting.
<span>It did not free slaves in already occupied Southern territory. </span><span>-It freed very few slaves immediately.
-It freed the slaves in the border states
</span>hope this helps
In my opinion, I believe Rockefeller came out with the better deal because Rockefeller's success with Vanderbilt provided him an advantage over others.
hope this helps:))