1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lynna [10]
3 years ago
9

In what year did the Norman Invasion begin​

History
2 answers:
Marat540 [252]3 years ago
6 0
The Norman Invasion began in the year 1066.
Svetllana [295]3 years ago
3 0

Answer and explanation:

Norman Invasion begin​ in 1066. More information: It end in 1485.

Hope this help you :3

You might be interested in
Helpppppppppppp plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
aliina [53]

UNICEF and its partners are trying to help a generation of Rwandan children recover their lives, especially in the areas of health, counseling and education:

offering support to households headed by minors through the provision of pedagogical materials, guidance, activities for income generation and professional training

preventing the spread of HIV / AIDS through education and guidance

providing immunization, and

supporting the official education system and helping children outside the school system

8 0
3 years ago
Ap3x please help me thanks
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

C. Vietnam took time and attention away from the war on poverty

Explanation:

The Vietnam war affected Johnson's war on poverty by "time and attention away from the war on poverty"

The Vietnam war which occurred between 1955 to 1975 covered the administration period of President Lyndon B. Johnson, who was the United States President between 1963 to 1969. However, in his efforts to fight poverty in the United States, which will improve education, medical care, urban problems, rural poverty, and transportation, etc. The cost and time spent on the Vietnam war "took away his attention from the war on poverty."

3 0
3 years ago
The framers of the constitution adopted montesquieu's notion of a "mixed regime" when they
AveGali [126]
D. By having the three different branches selected in three different ways, the founders were mixing different government styles. This allowed "everyone" to feel as if they could influence government. 
6 0
3 years ago
How do I do a power paragraph for history
IgorC [24]
Like this 8 sentences

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! Willing To Type Short Response To This
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

The leaders of the American Revolution made three great gambles. First, they sought independence from the powerful British Empire, becoming the first colonies in the Americas to revolt and seek independence from their mother empire. Second, they formed a union of thirteen states, which was also unprecedented, for the colonies had long histories of bickering with one another. Third, the revolutionaries committed their new states to a republic, then a radical and risky form of government. In a republic, the people were the sovereign—rejecting the rule of a monarch and aristocrats. Today we take for granted that governments elected by the people can be stable, long lasting, and effective. But the Americans in the new nation were not so sure, given the lessons of history. In 1789, the United States was the only large republic in the world; the others were a handful of small city-states scattered in Europe, and none of the larger republics in the history of the world had lasted very long. Like the ancient republic of Rome, they had collapsed and reverted to some form of tyranny, usually by a military dictator.

Any one of those three gambles was an enormous risk. The miracle was that the revolutionaries pulled off all three of them, winning their war against the British, and securing a generous boundary in the peace treaty of 1783: west to the Mississippi, south to Florida, and north to the Great Lakes, with the Atlantic Ocean as the eastern boundary.

During the mid-1780s, however, the new nation seemed about to collapse as quickly as it had been created. The first constitution of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781. It proved too weak to control the powerful state governments. Unable directly to tax people, the confederation lacked its own revenue and could not afford an army or a navy, or even to pay the interest on its massive war debt. American Indians defied the confederation, and the Europeans insisted that no republic could endure on such a big geographic scale.

Plus the states were roiled by social conflicts between the wealthy gentlemen and the common people over issues of credit or debit. Gentlemen faulted the state governments for pandering to common voters by offering to relieve debtors at the expense of their creditors, those gentlemen who had loaned them money and goods. The gentlemen concluded that the state governments were too democratic, which meant too responsive to public opinion. And when a rare state government did favor the creditors, it provoked resistance from armed farmers.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did elisabeth abegg start rescuing jews from the holocaust?
    9·1 answer
  • The League of Nations could enact sanctions, which are best defined as
    13·1 answer
  • Who did the 15th amendment grant the right to vote??
    11·2 answers
  • President William Howard Taft's economic approach to foreign policy was called ______
    6·1 answer
  • As of 2015, which is the largest US minority group?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between an interest group and a political party?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes the significance of the emancipation proclamation
    13·2 answers
  • List three reasons behind the fall of Delhi sultanate
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone help me please
    14·2 answers
  • what did churchill mean when he describe russia as being "a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma?"
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!