Answer:
Contribution per unit of scare resource (in hour) = $24 per hour
Explanation:
The question falls under the limiting factor analysis
<em>When a business is faced with a problem of shortage of a resource which can be used to produced more than one product type, to maximize the use of the resource , the business should allocate it for production purpose in such a way that </em><em>it maximizes the contribution per unit of the scare resource.</em>
Therefore Santario Company should allocate the machine hours to maximize the contribution per unit of machine hour.
Contribution per unit of scare resource is determine as follows:
Contribution per unit of scare resource for Model K-3
Contribution per unit of Model K-3 = $6
Machine time per unit = 15 minutes
<em>Contribution per unit of scare resource in minutes</em>
=Contribution per unit/Machine time per unit
= 46/15 minutes
= $0.4 per minute
Contribution per unit of scare resource (in hour)
$0.4 per minutes× 60
= $24 per hour
Answer: d. any of the choices.
Explanation:
Chaz is not to transfer the duties to a third party if Dolly got into the agreement with Chaz for any of the following;
- If Dolly places special trust in the ability of Chaz to perform the maintenance then that trust should not be broken by transferring the duties to a third party. Dolly went into that contract because they trusted in the abilities of Chaz.
- If Dolly went into the contract due to the personal skills or talents of Chaz, the duties against would be non-transferable. Chaz's skills were the reason the contract was signed, if these skills are not to be used then the contract will be baseless.
- By signing with Chaz, Dolly expects a certain level of performance. If the performance that will be made by a third contracting party is materially different from the one that Dolly would have expected from Chez, the duties will not be transferable.
<span>This is not a question that can really be answered with a specific number. The answer will vary from person to person and it would be best to consult a medical professional to get a solid answer for your individual situation. Some people would benefit by weight loss, others might just need to adjust their habits in order to improve their abilities and quality of life. Generally speaking, weight loss will not matter as much as eating healthy and getting regular exercise. Both of these will have an impact on quality of life.</span>
Answer:
Find attached question with multiple choices
The third option ,72,000 shares, is the correct answer.
Explanation:
A stock split refers to redenomination of shares by increasing the number of shares and proportionately reducing the number par value per share.
A 3-1 share split means that one prior share now commands three shares while the price of one share is apportioned between the three shares
Robinson now 3/1*24,000 shares=72,000 shares
One previous share was $1 par value but the three new shares would $1/3=$0.33 per share instead of the previous $1 par value
Answer:
The correct answer is Escalation of commitment bias.
Explanation:
Commitment bias is the tendency to use a loss (of time or money) as an excuse to increase that loss.
Let's see an example. We pay a cinema ticket to see a movie and after twenty minutes we understand that it is unbearable; Now, since we have already paid, we decided to see it to the end. Curiously, in that decision we will not only have lost money, we will also have wasted time seeing something that has ceased to interest us from the beginning. The curious thing is that this bias is present in many areas of life. We can see it in those couples who stay together without anyone fully understanding why. It is as if so much time “invested” in the couple comes before the fact that they get along badly (and worse and worse). The same with a job, with a friend or with the study.