Answer:
The Declaration and Bill of Rights reflect a fear of an overly centralized government imposing its will on the people of the states; the Constitution was designed to empower the central government to preserve the blessings of liberty for “We the People of the United States."
Establishing the Constitution required the ascent of states which would make it a Federal Act.
Federalism involves:
- A single nation having two types of governments with one being regional, and the other being general
- Regional governments being consulted when constitutions need to be amended
When the U.S. Constitution needed to be established and amended, it required the consent of the various states in the United States. This makes it a federal action because it involved the various states.
In conclusion, the establishment of the U.S. Consitution was a federal act because it involved the input and consent of the regional state governments.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/985210.</em>
Answer:
narrative
Explanation:
you're writing you're part and your opinion on why the argument is either correct or wrong!
The fall of the Inca Empire in the 1530s began with the Spanish bringing disease, small pox, over to the Inca Empire, (which is Peru) which killed thousands of Incas. After the Spanish brought over disease the emperor Atahuallpa was captured and then executed by Francisco Pizarro who was the leader of the Spanish. When the emperor died his two sons tired to rule the empire which caused a civil out break on who would take over. It ended when Atahualpa captured Huascar and killed him. When the Spanish tired to takeover the Inca empire they had firearms which could have easily taken over the Incas and their weapons which were not as advanced as the Spanish.
<em>A. Congress was denied power to regulate trade.</em>
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses, it did not give proper power to the national government, so they could not regulate trade, enforce laws, or tax citizens. Colonists were scared that if enough power got into the hands of the government, the same thing would happen with what happened with Great Britain. Although the national government had no judicial branch, would also be correct in this case, as the national government did not have enough power or resources to do so, the question states "mercantile laws", which have to do with trade. Congress did not have any power to regulate trade under the Articles of Confederation, as they hated how the British used to enforce laws on them about what they can and cannot trade, and who they can and cannot trade with.
