Answer:
unstructured interviews
Explanation:
June has interviewed two different people. For the first applicant, she asked about strengths and weaknesses; for the second applicant, she asked about interests and experiences. In these cases, June has conducted <u>unstructured</u> interviews. Unstructured interviews are interviews in which questions are not prearranged, the questions can change with the respondent and do not follow any particular sequence or order. This is opposed to structured interviews where the questions are prearranged and standardized.
I think that the question is:
Which of the following would serve as support for this assertion? and apart from the first sentence, those are options.
and the answer is: both of the above. One sentence lists the benefits for the team and the other for the company.
Joe Manchin is a United States Senator
Hes 74 years old and is an American politician and businessman serving as the senior United States senator from West Virginia
Hope this helped you- have a good day bro cya)
Answer:
we have more nuclear weapons
Explanation:
we have more nuclear weapons to this day, back then war wasn't so nuclear and was more guns and swords.
The correct answer is A. The constitution had strong support but also strong opposition.
Explanation
In the image, you can see three newspaper headlines that expose some of the situations that occurred during the ratification of the United States Constitution. One of them says "Constitution Ratified in Delaware" suggesting a general acceptance of the Constitution in this State. The second says "Pennsylvania Anti-Federalist Object to Constitution" expresses an idea of opposition to federalism in Pennsylvania. Finally, the headline of the third newspaper reads "Tough Debate Over Constitution in Connecticut" suggesting a fierce debate in which not everyone agreed or against this Constitution and in which several points were discussed. According to the above, it can be established that the correct answer is A. because the incumbents do not express a radical opinion of approval or disapproval of the Constitution.
